Within Puthoff
Did The Materials Claims Deliver?
TTSA made Puthoff more visible after 2017, but the public material claims remain a case of official interest rather than public proof.
On this page
- Puthoff's role in the TTSA wave
- The Army cooperation agreement
- Why examination is not validation
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
To The Stars Academy made Hal Puthoff more visible to a mainstream audience after 2017, but its best-known materials story did not deliver public proof of non-human technology. The more careful conclusion is narrower: TTSA persuaded real US Army researchers to examine claimed advanced materials, and later public testing by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and AARO treated one famous magnesium-bismuth specimen as worth checking. That is evidence of official interest, not validation of the original UFO provenance claim. The material was unusual enough to generate questions, but the published government-linked analysis found terrestrial isotope signatures and rejected the strongest proposed function: that it had operated as a bismuth-based terahertz waveguide. [AARO]aaro.milSynopsis: Analysis of a Metallic SpecimenAAROSynopsis: Analysis of a Metallic Specimen…
For Puthoff’s credibility, TTSA is therefore a mixed episode. It shows that he was embedded in an influential network able to move UAP claims into media, investor, military and policy channels. It also shows the central weakness in several Puthoff-adjacent UAP claims: serious-sounding institutional attention can be mistaken for evidential confirmation.
Puthoff’s role in the TTSA wave
To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science launched in 2017 as a public benefit corporation combining entertainment, aerospace-style ambition and UAP advocacy. Its public materials described Tom DeLonge, former CIA officer Jim Semivan and Hal Puthoff as central figures, with Puthoff presented as a “world-renowned quantum physicist” in company publicity. [PR Newswire]prnewswire.comPR Newswire To The Stars Academy Of Arts & Science Launches TodayPR Newswire To The Stars Academy Of Arts & Science Launches Today
Puthoff’s function was not that of a pilot witness or a crash-retrieval whistleblower. Within TTSA, he was closer to a scientific legitimiser and technical adviser: someone whose long record in fringe-adjacent physics, intelligence-funded remote-viewing work and exotic aerospace speculation made him useful to a movement trying to look more like a research and policy effort than a UFO fan organisation. That was part of TTSA’s wider strategy. In the aftermath of the 2017 New York Times coverage of Pentagon UFO work, TTSA tied together former defence and intelligence figures, Navy videos, public outreach, investor materials and claims of material evidence. TTSA itself highlighted that Luis Elizondo had joined Puthoff and Christopher Mellon in the new venture after leaving the Pentagon. [To The Stars*]to-the-stars.webflow.ioSource details in endnotes.
The important distinction is that Puthoff’s presence made the claims more technically framed, not automatically more proven. TTSA’s materials programme depended on three separable propositions: that unusual samples existed; that some had a possible UAP-related provenance; and that laboratory testing might reveal non-human manufacture or advanced function. The first proposition was easy to establish. The second and third required chain of custody, independent testing and reproducible evidence. Those are exactly where the public record remained weakest.
What TTSA claimed about the materials
TTSA’s materials work was organised under the ADAM Research Project, short for Acquisition and Data Analysis of Materials. The company described ADAM as an academic study of exotic materials for technology innovation, saying it had acquired samples “reported to come from advanced vehicles of unknown origin” from around the world. [To The Stars*]to-the-stars.webflow.ioSource details in endnotes.
One sample became especially important: a magnesium-zinc-bismuth or magnesium-bismuth layered specimen that had circulated in UFO circles for years. TTSA said the supplied documentation described it as coming from a UAP crash recovery, while also acknowledging that the source could not be verified. Its own public explanation identified several possible reasons for interest, including unusual chemical combinations, possible isotope anomalies and unusual structure. [To The Stars*]to-the-stars.webflow.ioSource details in endnotes.
That admission matters. A sample can be physically real and still have an unverifiable story attached to it. A layered metal fragment does not carry its own biography. Without reliable documentation showing where it was recovered, who handled it, what tests were performed, and how contamination or ordinary industrial origins were excluded, the “UAP crash recovery” label remains a claim about provenance rather than a demonstrated fact.
TTSA’s presentation also sometimes blurred public understanding by using terms such as “metamaterials” in a context already charged with alien-technology implications. In mainstream materials science, a metamaterial is an engineered structure designed to produce properties not normally found in bulk natural materials. In UFO discussion, however, the word often became a shorthand for “possibly alien alloy”. That gap between technical meaning and public implication helped TTSA attract attention, but it also increased the burden of proof.
The Army cooperation agreement
The strongest institutional fact in the TTSA materials story is the 2019 Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, or CRADA, with the US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Ground Vehicle Systems Center. A CRADA is a formal research collaboration mechanism, not a certification that the collaborator’s claims are true. In this case, the document said TTSA had “materiel and technology innovations” and that the government would use laboratories and resources to characterise technologies and assess possible applications for ground vehicles. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
The agreement’s language is revealing because it is conditional. It says the Army wanted to assess, test and characterise TTSA products, compare them with known materials, understand what would be needed to reproduce them and determine whether they had vehicle applications. It also states that if the government could verify TTSA’s materiel-solution claims, then significant advances might be possible in security, force protection and weight reduction. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
That “if” is the key word. The CRADA shows that Army personnel considered the claims worth a structured look. It does not show that the Army had confirmed UFO origin, antigravity capability, active camouflage, inertial mass reduction or any other extraordinary performance. The War Zone’s reporting captured this nuance well: the Army wanted to verify TTSA’s claims, and the agreement made clear that testing would be exploratory rather than confirmatory. [The War Zone]twz.comSource details in endnotes.
Several media accounts treated the agreement as strange but newsworthy because of the combination of a celebrity-linked UFO organisation and military laboratories. Live Science reported that the five-year contract involved at least $750,000 in support and resources and covered areas such as inertial mass reduction, metamaterials, electromagnetic waveguides, quantum communications and beamed energy propulsion. [Live Science]livescience.comLive Science Rock Star's Company Seeks UFOs, Finds Military ContractLive Science Rock Star's Company Seeks UFOs, Finds Military Contract Vice similarly framed the deal as a military collaboration to examine advanced-material claims for potential vehicle applications. [VICE]vice.comOpen source on vice.com.
For Puthoff, this was a credibility boost only in a limited institutional sense. He and TTSA had helped create a channel through which speculative UAP-related material claims reached a real defence research setting. But the same document also undercuts exaggerated readings: the Army’s role was to test claims against known standards, not to announce that TTSA possessed alien technology.
Why examination is not validation
The central mistake in many readings of the TTSA materials story is to treat official examination as proof. Governments, laboratories and defence organisations often examine uncertain claims because they are potentially relevant, because a public controversy has become prominent, because an official office has been asked to resolve a question, or because there is a low-cost chance that an unusual sample may have ordinary military or scientific value. None of that means the most dramatic origin story is true.
The later public analysis of the magnesium-bismuth specimen is the best example. AARO said it contracted Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 2022 to test a magnesium alloy specimen and determine whether it was terrestrial and whether it could serve as a terahertz waveguide. The AARO supplement says the specimen had been publicly alleged to be from a crashed extraterrestrial vehicle in 1947 and to have extraordinary properties, including antigravity-related claims. [AARO]aaro.mils Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic SpecimenAAROAARO's Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic Specimen…
ORNL’s findings did not support those claims. Its synopsis said the specimen’s magnesium and lead isotope composition was consistent with terrestrial manufactured materials, and that the examined structure did not indicate non-terrestrial origin. It also found that the material was highly unlikely to have functioned as a bismuth-based terahertz waveguide. [AARO]aaro.milSynopsis: Analysis of a Metallic SpecimenAAROSynopsis: Analysis of a Metallic Specimen…
AARO’s supplement was even more direct in its plain-language conclusion. It said the magnesium and lead ratios fell within standard values for manufactured materials, that the isotopic composition was “unremarkable”, and that the specimen’s characteristics were consistent with mid-20th-century magnesium alloy research and experimental manufacturing methods. It also noted that unverifiable and conflicting personal accounts complicated the chain of custody. [AARO]aaro.mils Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic SpecimenAAROAARO's Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic Specimen…
This does not prove that every TTSA sample was ordinary. It does mean the best-publicised material claim did not survive independent public testing in the form many supporters hoped. The result narrowed the claim from “possible evidence of non-human technology” to “an unusual or historically interesting metal specimen with no demonstrated exotic origin or function”.
The magnesium-bismuth case as a credibility test
The magnesium-bismuth sample is useful because it turns an abstract UAP debate into a testable chain. Supporters could point to a physical object, a proposed structure, possible aerospace significance and a route into official analysis. Sceptics could ask the obvious questions: Where exactly did it come from? Who owned it? What ordinary processes could produce it? Do isotope ratios look terrestrial? Does it actually perform the claimed function?
TTSA’s later response to ORNL and AARO tried to preserve ambiguity. The company said both ORNL and AARO had completed analysis of the material and that the reports did not offer a firm conclusion about origin and purpose “along with other seeming anomalies”. In a later Puthoff/Davis discussion, TTSA acknowledged that the analysis did not reveal proof of exotic origin, while also saying it did not absolutely rule it out. [To The Stars*]to-the-stars.webflow.ioSource details in endnotes.
That formulation is technically cautious but rhetorically important. Almost no laboratory test can “absolutely rule out” every exotic story about a damaged, poorly documented fragment. The more relevant evidential question is whether the positive case was strengthened. Publicly, it was not. The isotope data, structural findings and waveguide assessment all moved the case towards a terrestrial explanation.
This is where the episode bears directly on Puthoff’s credibility. Puthoff’s supporters can fairly say that he advocated analysis rather than simply asking the public to believe a legend. His critics can fairly reply that the public results did not vindicate the dramatic framing and that TTSA’s continued emphasis on unresolved mystery risks making weak evidence appear stronger than it is.
What supporters see in the TTSA episode
Supporters of Puthoff and TTSA tend to focus on the institutional trajectory. Before 2017, claims about recovered materials and UAP technology usually lived in specialist UFO circles. TTSA helped put those claims into a form that mainstream journalists, military researchers and policy audiences could discuss. The organisation also had people with recognisable government or aerospace backgrounds, including Puthoff, Semivan, Mellon, Elizondo and former Lockheed Martin Skunk Works figure Steve Justice.
From that perspective, the materials story was not a simple failure. It showed that claims long dismissed as fringe could be translated into specific research questions: isotope analysis, structural characterisation, waveguide potential, military utility and chain of custody. It also demonstrated a willingness, at least eventually, to let a national laboratory and AARO examine the specimen rather than keeping the claim entirely in private circulation.
Supporters may also argue that a negative result on one sample does not settle the whole UAP materials question. That is logically true. One terrestrial specimen does not prove that no unusual UAP-related material exists anywhere. But it does reduce the weight that can be placed on this particular TTSA-linked example, especially because it was one of the most publicly discussed cases.
What sceptics argue
Sceptics focus on the gap between presentation and proof. Scientific American raised concerns soon after the original 2017 “alien alloys” reporting, asking whether scientists really had materials they could not identify and warning that public discussion was running ahead of clear evidence. [Scientific American]scientificamerican.comScientific American The Truth about Those "Alien Alloys" in The New YorkScientific American The Truth about Those "Alien Alloys" in The New York
Vice later reported that TTSA paid $35,000 for “exotic” metals that might be ordinary material, highlighting the concern that money, publicity and mystery had gathered around samples before their provenance and properties were established. [VICE]vice.comTom De Longe's UFO Research Company PaidTom De Longe's UFO Research Company Paid The War Zone’s reporting on the CRADA was not dismissive, but it repeatedly stressed that the Army agreement was about verifying claims, not endorsing them. [The War Zone]twz.comSource details in endnotes.
The strongest sceptical point is methodological rather than ideological: extraordinary provenance claims require unusually strong documentation. A fragment said to have passed through private hands from a 1947 crash story needs more than unusual layering. It needs a reliable recovery record, secure custody, repeatable testing and performance that ordinary materials science cannot explain. The public TTSA materials record has not provided that.
What the episode says about Puthoff’s reliability
The TTSA materials claims neither destroy nor establish Puthoff’s credibility. They sharpen the distinction between three different kinds of credibility.
First, Puthoff had network credibility. He was clearly close to people and institutions that mattered in the post-2017 UAP wave, and TTSA’s Army agreement shows that his circle could get speculative claims into official research channels.
Second, he had technical-framing credibility. TTSA did not merely say “aliens crashed”; it talked about isotopes, metamaterials, waveguides, quantum physics and defence applications. That made the claims more testable and, for many readers, more serious.
Third, and most importantly, he lacked public proof credibility on the materials claim itself. The strongest published testing did not confirm exotic origin or advanced function. AARO and ORNL instead found terrestrial indicators and rejected the proposed terahertz-waveguide function for the examined specimen. [AARO]aaro.mils Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic SpecimenAAROAARO's Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic Specimen…
That leaves a balanced judgement. Puthoff should not be dismissed as someone with no access, no influence or no role in serious UAP-related research networks. But TTSA’s materials episode is a warning against converting access into evidence. The public record shows a real collaboration, real samples and real testing. It does not show delivered proof of non-human technology.
Did the materials claims deliver?
The fairest answer is: they delivered a better test of the claim, not the extraordinary result implied by the claim. TTSA helped turn a long-running UFO-materials story into something that could be examined by government-linked laboratories. That is meaningful because it moved the discussion away from pure anecdote. But when the best-known specimen was tested, the findings favoured a terrestrial, historically plausible explanation and did not validate the proposed exotic function.
For readers assessing Hal Puthoff, this episode is one of the clearest case studies in how his UAP credibility works. He is often near consequential developments, and he helps give speculative claims a technical vocabulary and institutional pathway. Yet the evidential endpoint can still be much weaker than the public aura around the claim. TTSA made the materials story more visible and more testable. The public evidence so far says official interest was real, but public proof did not arrive.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did The Materials Claims Deliver?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
American Cosmic
Directly overlaps with personalities and evidence debates surrounding TTSA.
The Hunt for Zero Point
Connects speculative technology narratives to real-world investigation.
Endnotes
-
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Synopsis: Analysis of a Metallic Specimen
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/ORNL-Synopsis_Analysis_of_a_Metallic_Specimen.pdf?ver=V1rMXfRV-VUb2gjTd4DzVg%3D%3DSource snippet
AAROSynopsis: Analysis of a Metallic Specimen...
-
Source: aaro.mil
Title: ‘s Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Analysis of a Metallic Specimen
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/AAROs_Supplement_to_ORNLs_Analysis_of_a_Metallic_Specimen.pdfSource snippet
AAROAARO's Supplement to Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Analysis of a Metallic Specimen...
-
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault
Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/army/TTSA-ARMY-CRADA.pdf -
Source: vice.com
Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/tom-delonges-ufo-research-group-signs-contract-with-us-army-to-develop-far-future-tech/ -
Source: vice.com
Title: Tom De Longe’s UFO Research Company Paid
Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/tom-delonges-ufo-research-company-paid-dollar35000-for-exotic-metals-that-might-actually-just-be-bismuth/ -
Source: newswire.com
Title: own a piece of to the stars academy of arts science 21220581
Link: https://www.newswire.com/news/own-a-piece-of-to-the-stars-academy-of-arts-science-21220581 -
Source: ornl.gov
Link: https://www.ornl.gov/news/materials-bulk-metallic-insight -
Source: impact.ornl.gov
Title: epitaxial growth of strontium bismuth tantalatcniobate on buffere
Link: https://impact.ornl.gov/en/publications/epitaxial-growth-of-strontium-bismuth-tantalatcniobate-on-buffere/ -
Source: prnewswire.com
Title: PR Newswire To The Stars Academy Of Arts & Science Launches Today
Link: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/to-the-stars-academy-of-arts–science-launches-today-300534912.html -
Source: tothestars.media
Title: to the stars academy history channel bring you 6 part docuseries in may
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/to-the-stars-academy-history-channel-bring-you-6-part-docuseries-in-may?srsltid=AfmBOopCQJk9MTud-cXCyyVaRuJdmOXuoHPdS2_KP9zN0TOEW7TMo6PM -
Source: tothestars.media
Title: To The Stars*The New York Times: Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/the-new-york-times-glowing-auras-and-black-money-the-pentagon-s-mysterious-u-f-o-program?srsltid=AfmBOopeiyzBUu8aAGolMn_i0_TKLuSgn8WQqWpX8h1PnA4oqlSA1Ldu -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/pages/research?srsltid=AfmBOoqRwLreqFC2uqmxTQhLeqE-V_gwg7YZhe5UB9t_io2JYsMML7aD -
Source: tothestars.media
Title: To The Stars*Material of Interest: Magnesium-Zinc-Bismuth
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/material-of-interest-magnesium-zinc-bismuth?srsltid=AfmBOop5qojR847sIXmPfS1iOFoSzz0IOcpeSB9mwOnvY8cAoYtQdLaS -
Source: twz.com
Link: https://www.twz.com/30498/the-army-wants-to-verify-to-the-stars-academys-fantastic-ufo-mystery-material-claims -
Source: livescience.com
Title: Live Science Rock Star’s Company Seeks UFOs, Finds Military Contract
Link: https://www.livescience.com/ufo-hunting-contract-us-army.html -
Source: tothestars.media
Title: To The Stars*ORNL and AARO Material Analysis Update
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/ornl-and-aaro-material-analysis?srsltid=AfmBOoqnwzHbt093YVKi9w5Fjgz0hVrygsZHd7-LswsexPpSpVEZUKZV -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/tts-analysis-on-ornl?srsltid=AfmBOooP6JSJr4KnH63n4IaUGleTbE4gcyp1WqDLaqS2XpYv7TvExUOB -
Source: scientificamerican.com
Title: Scientific American The Truth about Those “Alien Alloys” in The New York
Link: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-truth-about-those-alien-alloys-in-the-new-york-times-ufo-story/ -
Source: tothestars.media
Title: ttsa announces crada with u s army ccdc
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/ttsa-announces-crada-with-u-s-army-ccdc?srsltid=AfmBOorqQZYfTtgGVrsYFfGNBjafsi1o4F19Z0sOowI1bMPZrjFVXZdj -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/tts-analysis-on-ornl?srsltid=AfmBOora7juy3PY_VHzgeXCAj-APJelkc9O9piQVicvMtp8LzRq4rT_K -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/tts-analysis-on-ornl?srsltid=AfmBOopMoG7Hbh_BlOG01iNDl9IGeAzjnnYOFshdOHF4PI1nPqkm_EtQ -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/crada-faq?srsltid=AfmBOoo7vMRGEBT4OvKDA1j6uxF5-esv82lNTBTzXRSK7HOVPSUWHNKJ -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/tts-analysis-on-ornl?srsltid=AfmBOorf1JvdQKXFLbSdZznCZt-CLsHwLyVBOBxav9p2637jW1MYaafN -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/en-gb/blogs/press-and-news/tts-analysis-on-ornl?srsltid=AfmBOopTTVTaBoA2WHKrontRHXdHFBAc6GMc_dFYGEo5Mnnp1XwhpInu -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/material-of-interest-magnesium-zinc-bismuth?srsltid=AfmBOoqrH-u251egNp5pSjr9kuzMzaUkVq7C5xLssXgukh1_vgoZjPDm -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/ornl-and-aaro-material-analysis?srsltid=AfmBOopAnr9eYczbgMyfBYJkobmxi3L5nddZxCzJM6sqkDBKOQBHsF9G -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/material-of-interest-magnesium-zinc-bismuth?srsltid=AfmBOoqopYMjsMi0PjlXIaslD_DfGxVKB7Fc1gxsWxgDbnqrscnnZvfp -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/ornl-and-aaro-material-analysis?srsltid=AfmBOopOvvETY-DV8J1ZKr6MHaHTh7TP0EA8T8AgnjLjxt1oSYKQIv5n -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/pages/research?srsltid=AfmBOoprFIMDgbI8OEeBxSvXNPh4vKyiVl38VRmb2xzf-YfEP7o-VITJ -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/pages/research?srsltid=AfmBOooRZfH7iEWtPfKhirGCZWBNEDlsqH8z8NEUBPyHs2CIHAt24T5V -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/pages/about?srsltid=AfmBOoqex4f1ZJFemRs7FT7gCZGuFHD8qvjNnXsPy3ol1xQ–2irHnQV -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/fr-ca/blogs/press-and-news/elizondo-leaves-pentagon-to-join-to-the-stars-academy-of-arts-science?srsltid=AfmBOoqqNmJm5O5KToi_e15pD4D1n50TeBSVlJo4WVpCXMkCoiex_n9H -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/elizondo-leaves-pentagon-to-join-to-the-stars-academy-of-arts-science?srsltid=AfmBOooFG3tr0jqxMGh9I03qR4BjmEHZegN4ceX06nRsGhZk4nYjbwNo -
Source: tothestars.media
Link: https://tothestars.media/pages/research?srsltid=AfmBOopPhVrtClcqbSryzbL4RlubjU2e1UTAXQLLnpltqKhqwHyKtIh9 -
Source: us.mensa.org
Title: to the stars academy unafraid to investigate the unexplained
Link: https://www.us.mensa.org/read/bulletin/features/to-the-stars-academy-unafraid-to-investigate-the-unexplained/ -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: To The Stars Inc
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_The_Stars_Inc -
Source: to-the-stars-web-assets.s3.amazonaws.com
Title: TTSA Offering Circular 092917 vLAUNCH DAY
Link: https://to-the-stars-web-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/downloads/TTSA_Offering_Circular_092917_vLAUNCH_DAY.pdf -
Source: instagram.com
Link: https://www.instagram.com/tothestarsacademy/?hl=en-gb -
Source: prnewswire.com
Link: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/to-the-stars-academy-of-arts–science-announces-crada-with-the-us-army-combat-capabilities-development-command-to-advance-materiel-and-technology-innovations-300940211.html -
Source: to-the-stars.webflow.io
Link: https://to-the-stars.webflow.io/
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: New UAP [Materials Tests]({{ ‘materials-test/’ | relative_url }}): What the Results Reveal | Dr. Garry Nolan
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mifx4nzPY68Source snippet
The ADAM Research Project Begins outlines To The Stars Academy's initial framework and contract with Hal Puthoff's EarthTech Internationa...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Garry Nolan: UFOs and Aliens | Lex Fridman Podcast #262
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTCc2-1tbBQSource snippet
New UAP Materials Tests: What the Results Reveal | Dr. Garry Nolan...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: How To Scientifically Test & Analyze Potential UAP/UFO Material
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbAtCzZIIskSource snippet
Art's Parts 1: UFO Crash Recovery Material Analysis...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Art’s Parts 1: UFO Crash Recovery Material Analysis
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1LylzKZC-USource snippet
Garry Nolan: UFOs and Aliens | Lex Fridman Podcast #262...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/8NewsNOW/posts/details-on-experiments-35k-pricetag-on-a-chunk-of-metal-sold-to-former-blink-182/10157735635636303/?locale=hi_IN -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/SteveBartlettShow/posts/a-few-days-ago-161-classified-uap-files-were-released-to-the-public-that-include/1531892531652951/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/lufos/posts/1984745915751802/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/fox5dc/posts/dr-hal-puthoff-claims-the-us-has-recovered-the-remains-of-four-separate-species-/1463366465827909/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/fox29philadelphia/posts/dr-hal-puthoff-claims-the-us-has-recovered-the-remains-of-four-separate-species-/1448858457276612/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/ScienceNaturePage/posts/ex-cia-researcher-claims-us-has-alien-remains-from-crashed-ufossensational-claim/1532998301614367/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Parent topic
PuthoffRelated pages 7
- AAWSAP AATIP What Did AAWSAP Actually Prove?
- Access vs Proof Does Insider Access Prove His UFO Claims?
- Bigelow Links Why the Bigelow Network Matters
- Credibility Split Why People Disagree About Puthoff
- Exotic Physics Where Physics Ends and Speculation Begins
- Remote Viewing Did Remote Viewing Help or Hurt His Credibility?
- Ultraterrestrials What Is Puthoff Really Claiming?



