Within Taylor
What Has Taylor Really Claimed First Hand?
Taylor's credibility is clearer when his first-hand experiences are separated from stories he investigated, repeated or interpreted.
On this page
- First hand experiences and observations
- Interpretations made on television
- Second hand or institutional claims
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Travis Taylor’s UFO/UAP credibility is easiest to judge when his claims are split into three different buckets: what he says he directly experienced, what he interpreted from instruments or television experiments, and what he amplified from official or second-hand sources. His strongest public position is not that he personally saw alien technology. It is that, as a scientist on The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch and a former UAP Task Force participant, he encountered events and data he regarded as unexplained. The weaker step comes when unexplained readings, edited television moments or classified-context references are treated by audiences as evidence of exotic craft, hidden technology or a coherent “phenomenon”. Taylor has real technical credentials and a verified UAP Task Force link, but the public evidence for his most dramatic claims remains filtered through TV production, incomplete datasets and institutional secrecy. [Space Symposium 2026]spacesymposium.orgdr travis taylordr travis taylor [The Black]theblackvault.comSource details in endnotes.
The Useful Divide: Witness, Interpreter, Amplifier
A fair reading of Taylor’s public UAP record starts with role separation. He is sometimes a witness, sometimes an experiment designer, sometimes a commentator, and sometimes a conduit for claims already circulating in the UAP world. Those roles do not carry the same evidential weight.
When Taylor is a witness, the relevant question is simple: did he personally observe the event, and was it independently recorded in a way outsiders can inspect? Examples include alleged events on The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, such as UFO sightings over the ranch, unusual radiation readings, rocket anomalies and equipment disruptions. The problem is not that these events are automatically false; it is that most are publicly known through a produced television programme rather than through a complete open dataset.
When Taylor is an interpreter, the claim becomes more technical. He may be explaining what a radiation detector, GPS track, radar display, laser experiment, camera frame or rocket launch appeared to show. That is stronger than campfire hearsay, but it still depends on calibration, chain of custody, raw data access, environmental controls and whether alternative explanations have been ruled out.
When Taylor is an amplifier, the claim may not be his at all. His UAP Task Force work, his appearances in UFO media, and his participation in wider disclosure culture often bring him close to claims made by pilots, officials, intelligence figures, ranch owners, previous investigators or television guests. In those cases, Taylor’s résumé may make the claim sound more authoritative, but it does not turn a second-hand account into a first-hand observation.
What Taylor Appears To Have Claimed First-Hand
The clearest first-hand material comes from his Skinwalker Ranch work. Sky History describes Taylor as an engineer with advanced degrees who joined the ranch team to apply scientific methods to the site’s alleged mysteries, while the University of Alabama in Huntsville described him and other UAH-linked researchers preparing instrument payloads, balloons and experiments to measure claimed electromagnetic anomalies at the ranch. [Sky HISTORY TV channel]history.co.ukSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV ChannelSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV Channel
That gives the first-hand bucket a concrete shape. Taylor was not merely repeating old ranch folklore from a distance; he was physically present for experiments and participated in designing or interpreting some of them. Reported examples include:
- Radiation-related episodes, including a Sky History clip description saying Taylor became seriously unwell after the team investigated Homestead 2 with ground-penetrating radar and uncovered a mysterious manhole. [Sky HISTORY TV channel]history.co.ukSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV ChannelSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV Channel
- Aerial and rocket experiments, including programme descriptions in which the team launches rockets through or above areas of interest and reports unidentified phenomena or unusual redirections. [Sky HISTORY TV channel]history.co.ukSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV ChannelSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV Channel
- Instrumented fieldwork, including UAH’s description of balloon payloads and electromagnetic measurements involving Taylor, Dr Matt Turner, Dr Jim Segala and other team members. [UAH]uah.eduCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social SciencesCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences
These are first-hand in the limited sense that Taylor was present for some experiments and apparently treated the results as important. They are not first-hand proof of alien craft, non-human intelligence or a hidden technology programme. The public record usually shows the event, the edited reaction and the team’s interpretation, not the complete raw dataset with enough independent replication to settle the issue.
The Skinwalker Ranch Problem: Observation Is Not Verification
Skinwalker Ranch is the place where Taylor’s first-hand claims are most vivid and most vulnerable. The ranch is marketed as a site with a long history of UFO, paranormal, animal-mutilation and unusual-energy claims. That context makes it compelling television, but it also raises the evidential bar. A location with a strong legend can shape what viewers, investigators and producers treat as significant.
The show’s own framing blends scientific investigation with entertainment language. Sky History says Taylor brought “hard science” to an “incredible mystery”, while History’s programme descriptions refer to paranormal and UFO events that “no one can explain”. [Sky HISTORY TV channel]history.co.ukSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV ChannelSky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV Channel That matters because a mainstream reader may assume the presence of an engineer means the programme has reached scientific conclusions. In reality, an engineer on screen can help design tests, recognise anomalies and ask better questions, but television does not provide the same standards as a published technical paper.
The strongest version of the pro-Taylor argument is that he put instruments on the problem rather than merely retelling old stories. UAH’s account describes actual experimental support: payloads, balloons, rocketry expertise and attempts to measure electromagnetic anomalies. [UAH]uah.eduCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social SciencesCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences The sceptical counterpoint is that the public rarely receives enough information to assess controls, false positives, equipment behaviour, environmental confounders or the full sequence of failed and successful tests.
This distinction is crucial. A strange detector reading is a real observation if the instrument recorded it. But the cause of that reading remains open unless the instrument was properly calibrated, the environment was controlled, the raw data are available, and alternative explanations were tested. Taylor’s first-hand ranch claims are therefore best treated as reports of anomalous field observations, not as publicly verified conclusions about what caused them.
Television Interpretations: Where Taylor’s Claims Become More Ambitious
Taylor often appears at the point where an event becomes a hypothesis. A rocket behaves oddly; a detector spikes; a camera captures something ambiguous; a GPS path looks distorted; the team then discusses whether the ranch itself, a subsurface structure, a “high zone”, a “bubble” or some unknown force might be involved. That mechanism is central to his public role.
The issue is not that interpretation is illegitimate. Science depends on interpretation. The issue is that the more ambitious the interpretation, the more evidence it needs. For example, a rocket appearing to deviate during a ranch experiment could involve wind, launch angle, thrust irregularity, camera perspective, optical artefacts, tracking error or ordinary mechanical failure before any exotic cause is considered. A detector alarm may signal radiation, but it may also require careful analysis of detector type, placement, shielding, background levels and contamination.
NASA’s 2023 UAP study made a point that applies directly to this sort of case: UAP analysis is hampered by poor sensor calibration, lack of multiple measurements, missing sensor metadata and lack of baseline data. NASA’s public-facing conclusion was not that unusual observations should be ignored, but that reliable conclusions require higher-quality, standardised data. [WIRED]wired.comNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIREDNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIRED
That standard is a useful yardstick for Taylor. He is strongest when he says, in effect, “we recorded something odd and need to investigate it”. He is weaker when viewers or promoters move from “odd” to “non-human”, “interdimensional”, “intelligent” or “government-confirmed” without publicly available evidence carrying the weight.
UAP Task Force Claims: Stronger Institutionally, Weaker Publicly
Taylor’s UAP Task Force connection is the most important non-ranch part of his credibility. Space Symposium’s 2026 speaker biography states that from 2019 to 2022 he served as Chief Scientist for the UAP Task Force supporting the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense. [Space Symposium 2026]spacesymposium.orgdr travis taylordr travis taylor The Black Vault also reported in 2022 that Taylor was identified as a scientist working with the UAP Task Force and that his role involved analysis connected to the 144 incidents discussed in the 2021 ODNI assessment. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comSource details in endnotes.
This is a different kind of claim from Skinwalker Ranch. It is not primarily a first-hand sighting claim; it is an institutional-access claim. It supports the view that Taylor had some role in official UAP analysis. It does not, by itself, disclose what he saw, what data he reviewed, which cases he judged strongest, or whether any case resisted explanation after later investigation.
The ODNI’s public page for the 2021 preliminary assessment says the report relayed the UAP Task Force’s progress in understanding UAP. [DNI]dni.govOpen source on dni.gov. But the public version of that process was cautious. Later public reporting and official summaries repeatedly stress uncertainty, data limits and the possibility of ordinary explanations. Wired’s summary of NASA’s report notes that the 2021 Pentagon report covered 144 sightings and identified only one with high confidence, while still treating the likely categories as including clutter, natural phenomena, development programmes and foreign systems. [WIRED]wired.comNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIREDNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIRED
So the UAP Task Force material should be placed in the “amplified and analysed” bucket, not the “Taylor personally witnessed” bucket. Taylor may have reviewed classified or restricted information, but readers cannot independently test claims based on material they cannot see.
Claims He Amplified From Other People
A large share of Taylor’s public UAP environment consists of claims made by others: ranch owners, previous Skinwalker investigators, military personnel, intelligence figures, pilots, television guests and UFO journalists. Taylor’s presence often gives those claims a technical gloss, even where he did not originate them.
Examples include the broader Skinwalker Ranch mythology: decades of alleged UFO sightings, animal mutilations, poltergeist-like events, strange creatures, “dangerous electromagnetic forces” and folklore attached to the property. UAH’s article summarises this legendary setting while also noting that Taylor was brought in for a more active research phase after Brandon Fugal’s initial observation-only period. [UAH]uah.eduCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social SciencesCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences Taylor did not personally witness the historic ranch cases that predate his arrival; he entered an existing narrative.
The same applies to government-UAP discourse. Taylor’s role with the UAP Task Force places him near reports submitted by military witnesses and sensor operators. But unless Taylor was personally present for a particular encounter, he is not the primary witness. He is an analyst or commentator on someone else’s report.
That difference matters because the credibility chain becomes longer:
- A pilot, sensor operator, ranch witness or investigator reports an event.
- Data or testimony is passed to a team, programme, television production or official process.
- Taylor helps interpret, discuss or present it.
- Media and audiences repeat it as “Taylor says” or “the Pentagon scientist says”.
Each step can add authority, but each step can also add distortion. The original claim may be sincere and still be misread. The data may be real and still be incomplete. Taylor may be competent and still be interpreting a limited record.
What Sceptics Challenge Most
Sceptics tend not to dispute that Taylor has technical qualifications or that he had a UAP Task Force connection. The sharper criticism is about standards of evidence, role-blurring and the relationship between official UAP work and paranormal television.
Science journalist Keith Kloor reported in Science that Taylor did serve in a lead role with the UAP Task Force, while critics were concerned by the Pentagon’s willingness to rely on a reality-TV figure associated with supernatural claims. [Science]science.nasa.govuap independent study team final reportuap independent study team final report The criticism is not simply personal; it is methodological. If a public figure moves between classified analysis, entertainment formats and speculative interpretation, the audience can struggle to tell where the evidence ends and the performance begins.
More broadly, AARO’s later historical review and public reporting have pushed back against the idea that government UAP activity has verified extraterrestrial technology. Reuters reported in March 2024 that AARO found no evidence that US government investigations had confirmed any UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology, and that better data would probably resolve many cases as ordinary objects or phenomena. [Reuters]reuters.comOpen source on reuters.com. The Guardian’s summary of the same report noted AARO’s finding of no empirical evidence for claims that the US government or private companies were reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. [The Guardian]theguardian.comSource details in endnotes.
Those findings do not debunk every Taylor-related observation at Skinwalker Ranch. They do, however, weaken any attempt to use Taylor’s government role as a shortcut to “therefore the extraordinary claims are confirmed”.
What Supporters Find Persuasive
Supporters see Taylor differently. To them, his value lies in being a technically trained person willing to go where many scientists will not. He has advanced degrees, a long defence-and-aerospace background, television experience and verified proximity to official UAP analysis. Space Symposium lists his decades of work on advanced technology programmes for the Department of Defense, NASA and the intelligence community, including propulsion concepts, space telescopes, beamed-energy systems, quantum information systems and future combat technologies. [Space Symposium 2026]spacesymposium.orgdr travis taylordr travis taylor
From that perspective, Taylor’s first-hand ranch involvement matters because he did not merely endorse stories from afar. He participated in experiments, brought in technical collaborators, and treated anomalous observations as investigable rather than ridiculous. UAH’s account supports the idea that at least some ranch work involved real researchers, payloads and measurement attempts, not just spooky narration. [UAH]uah.eduCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social SciencesCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences
The supporter case is strongest when framed modestly: Taylor is a qualified engineer who has seen and analysed things he cannot fully explain, and he has pushed for more instrumented investigation. It becomes weaker when supporters treat his credentials as confirmation of conclusions that have not been publicly demonstrated.
A Practical Credibility Scale For Taylor’s Claims
The cleanest way to assess Taylor is to rank claims by how directly they connect to him and how independently they can be checked.
Most credible: verified role claims. Taylor’s technical background and UAP Task Force role are supported by public biographies and reporting. These facts establish access and qualifications, not the truth of every UAP interpretation. [Space Symposium 2026]spacesymposium.orgdr travis taylordr travis taylor
Moderately credible: first-hand participation in experiments. Taylor was involved in Skinwalker Ranch fieldwork, including instrumented experiments and television-documented investigations. These claims are credible as participation claims, but the public evidence is usually insufficient to verify the cause of the anomalies. [UAH]uah.eduCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social SciencesCollege of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences
Unresolved: anomalous readings and visual events. Radiation alarms, rocket anomalies, strange aerial objects and equipment effects may be real observations within the show’s record, but they remain unresolved without raw data, independent replication and full technical context. NASA’s UAP study is a useful warning here: poor calibration, missing metadata and lack of multiple measurements can prevent definitive conclusions. [WIRED]wired.comNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIREDNASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIRED
Weakest: extraordinary conclusions inferred by audiences or media. Claims that ranch phenomena prove non-human intelligence, hidden alien technology, portals or a unified exotic mechanism are not publicly established by Taylor’s first-hand observations. AARO’s public position that it has found no verified extraterrestrial technology in US government UAP investigations makes this caution especially important. [Reuters]reuters.comnasa panel hold first public meeting ufo study ahead report 2023 05 31nasa panel hold first public meeting ufo study ahead report 2023 05 31
The Bottom Line On First-Hand Versus Amplified Claims
Taylor’s first-hand UAP record is real but narrower than his reputation sometimes suggests. He appears to have personally participated in unusual Skinwalker Ranch experiments and treated some observations as unexplained. He also had a verified official role connected to UAP analysis. Those facts make him more relevant than a casual UFO commentator.
They do not make him a first-hand witness to the strongest claims often attached to modern UFO discourse. Much of what surrounds him is interpreted data, edited television presentation, historic ranch lore, classified-context implication or second-hand institutional reporting. The fairest conclusion is therefore mixed: Taylor is a credible participant in UAP investigation as a technical actor, but he is not a publicly sufficient proof-source for extraordinary UAP claims unless the underlying evidence is made available, independently tested and separated from the claims he merely amplified.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Has Taylor Really Claimed First Hand?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs
Directly helps readers separate first-hand observations from interpretation and institutional reporting.
In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Sci...
Focuses on witnesses, officials, evidence claims and credibility questions similar to those surrounding Taylor.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Examines how official investigations handle witness reports and unexplained cases.
American Cosmic
Explores how claims gain meaning and authority beyond direct observation.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: uah.edu
Title: College of Arts, Humanities, & Social Sciences
Link: https://www.uah.edu/ahs/departments/interdisciplinary-studies/news-is/15032-uah-scientists-brave-curses-spooky-anomalies-to-unravel-secrets-at-skinwalker-ranch -
Source: wired.com
Title: NASA Didn’t Find Aliens—but if You See Any UFOs, Holler | WIRED
Link: https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-ufos-aliens-report-2023 -
Source: dni.gov
Link: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2021/3550-preliminary-assessment-unidentified-aerial-phenomena -
Source: reuters.com
Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/ -
Source: history.com
Link: https://www.history.com/shows/the-secret-of-skinwalker-ranch/articles/7-of-the-most-mind-bending-moments-on-skinwalker-ranch -
Source: history.com
Link: https://www.history.com/shows/the-secret-of-skinwalker-ranch -
Source: history.com
Link: https://www.history.com/shows/the-secret-of-skinwalker-ranch/season-6/episode-4 -
Source: dni.gov
Title: Prelimary Assessment UAP 20210625
Link: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf -
Source: dni.gov
Title: DF 2021 00275 Preliminary Assessment Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Link: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/DF-2021-00275-Preliminary-Assessment-Unidentified-Aerial-Phenomena.pdf -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/ -
Source: reuters.com
Title: nasa panel hold first public meeting ufo study ahead report 2023 05 31
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/nasa-panel-hold-first-public-meeting-ufo-study-ahead-report-2023-05-31/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Official UAP Imagery
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ -
Source: spacesymposium.org
Title: dr [travis taylor]({{ ‘how-credible-is-travis-taylor-on-uaps/’ | relative_url }})
Link: https://www.spacesymposium.org/speaker/dr-travis-taylor/ -
Source: theblackvault.com
Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/timeline-post/pentagon-releases-details-about-dr-travis-taylors-uap-task-force-involvement/ -
Source: history.co.uk
Title: Sky HISTORY TV channel Dr Travis Taylor | Sky HISTORY TV Channel
Link: https://www.history.co.uk/shows/curse-of-skinwalker-ranch/dr-travis-taylor -
Source: history.co.uk
Title: Sky HISTORY TV channel Travis Exposed to Ionising Radiation at Homestead 2
Link: https://www.history.co.uk/videos/travis-exposed-to-ionising-radiation-at-homestead-2-curse-of-skinwalker-ranch -
Source: history.co.uk
Title: Sky HISTORY TV channel Rockets defy laws of physics?!
Link: https://www.history.co.uk/videos/rockets-defy-laws-of-physics-curse-of-skinwalker-ranch -
Source: history.co.uk
Link: https://www.history.co.uk/shows/curse-of-skinwalker-ranch/episodes -
Source: science.org
Title: pentagon ufo study led researcher who believes supernatural
Link: https://www.science.org/content/article/pentagon-ufo-study-led-researcher-who-believes-supernatural -
Source: theguardian.com
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/08/pentagon-ufo-report-hiding-aliens -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_of_Skinwalker_Ranch -
Source: documents3.theblackvault.com
Title: Records pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
Link: https://documents3.theblackvault.com/documents/cbp/Records%20pertaining%20to%20Unidentified%20Aerial%20Phenomenon.pdf -
Source: theblackvault.com
Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/inside-the-uap-task-force-heavily-redacted-communications-regarding-dr-travis-taylor-and-ufo-research-efforts-released/ -
Source: reddit.com
Title: office of the director of national intelligence
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/o7wpjg/office_of_the_director_of_national_intelligence/ -
Source: imdb.com
Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10589968/episodes/?year=2022%2F1000 -
Source: imdb.com
Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10589968/episodes/?season=6 -
Source: imdb.com
Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10589968/episodes/ -
Source: imdb.com
Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10589968/episodes/?year=2020 -
Source: imdb.com
Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10589968/episodes/?year=2022 -
Source: tvmaze.com
Title: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch
Link: https://www.tvmaze.com/shows/42713/the-secret-of-skinwalker-ranch/episodeguide
Additional References
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/posts/a-nasa-report-into-unidentified-flying-objects-ufos-has-found-no-evidence-that-t/686500760179269/ -
Source: instagram.com
Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMYV0x3pHVk/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/LBC/posts/astrophysicist-backs-reforms-ufo-taskforce/986558850428278/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1065166071460425/posts/1610062500304110/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/SkinwalkerRanchOfficial/posts/dr-travis-s-taylor-the-scientist-behind-the-sciencewith-phds-in-optical-science-/957259129853974/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/z9165b/dr_travis_taylor_former_chief_scientist_on_the/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/NewsNationNow/posts/george-knapp-of-mysterywirecom-says-a-lot-of-recent-evidence-has-come-to-light-b/3008779399345625/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/CSPAN/posts/house-oversight-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-uap-live-online-here/1273276851508015/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/HISTORY/posts/huge-gamma-rays-force-a-sudden-evacuation-new-episodes-of-thesecretofskinwalkerr/1287070252985948/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/16ij6ui/nasa_shares_unidentified_anomalous_phenomena/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Parent topic
TaylorRelated pages 7
- Credentials Do Taylor's Credentials Prove His UAP Claims?
- Media Role Scientist, Insider or TV Personality?
- Radiation What Should Readers Make of the Radiation Claim?
- Sceptics Why Are Sceptics Unconvinced by Taylor?
- Skinwalker Does Skinwalker Ranch Strengthen or Weaken Taylor?
- Supporters Why Do Supporters Trust Taylor's UAP Work?
- Task Force What Did Taylor Actually Do for the UAP Task Force?