Where Did Green Fit Into AAWSAP?

Introduction

Kit Green’s connection to AAWSAP and AATIP is best understood as a narrow but important piece of a much wider governance problem. He was not publicly shown to be running the programme, and he later described himself as a consultant rather than part of Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies or AAWSAP. But his biological-effects work sits exactly where the programme became controversial: a government-funded aerospace-threat contract that produced some conventional-looking technical studies, while also absorbing UFO cases, alleged injury reports, Skinwalker Ranch material, remote viewing, and claims about exotic or paranormal phenomena. [UFO Trail]ufotrail.blogspot.comUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn'tUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn't

That matters for Green’s credibility because AAWSAP and AATIP can be read in two very different ways. Supporters see them as evidence that serious national-security institutions were willing to examine anomalous aerospace cases, including possible human effects. Critics see the same record as evidence of weak oversight, speculative programme drift, contractor capture, and thin evidential standards. The public record supports parts of both readings: the DIA contract was real, the technical deliverables were real, Green’s paper was real, but the later official review found no empirical evidence that the programme established extraterrestrial technology, recovered craft, or a hidden reverse-engineering effort. [defense]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1 Intelligence Agency [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

How AAWSAP and AATIP entered public debate

The modern public story began in December 2017, when reporting on a secretive Pentagon UFO programme pushed AATIP into mainstream news and linked it to Harry Reid, Robert Bigelow, Luis Elizondo, Navy pilot encounters, and a reported budget of about $22 million. The Federation of American Scientists later summarised the DIA disclosure as a 2007–2012 activity that funded research into warp drive, invisibility cloaking and other speculative science or engineering topics; it also noted that DIA released a list of 38 research titles under FOIA in January 2019. [Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOsFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs

The official paper trail, however, complicates the simple “Pentagon UFO programme” headline. A DIA briefing describes the July 2008 supplemental appropriation as a task to study “foreign advanced aerospace weapon threats” out to 40 years, with $10 million in FY08 funds and a contract awarded to Bigelow Aerospace to study 11 technical areas, with an emphasis on unconventional technologies. The same DIA update says BAASS was in compliance with contract HHM402-08-C-0072 and had delivered 26 detailed research reports by June 2009, twice the minimum requirement. [defense]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

That official framing is important because it explains why AAWSAP can look respectable on paper. Its stated purpose was future aerospace threat assessment, not a television-style hunt for aliens. The listed report titles include topics such as inertial electrostatic confinement fusion, pulse-power weaponry, invisibility cloaking, wormholes, antigravity, vacuum energy and field effects on biological tissues. These are not all UFO claims; many are speculative or frontier aerospace ideas that could be presented as long-range technology scanning. [defense]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

The shift from AAWSAP to AATIP is one of the main sources of confusion. AARO’s 2024 historical review says DIA established AAWSAP in 2009, “which was also known AATIP”, but adds a crucial distinction: unlike AAWSAP, AATIP was never an official DoD programme. According to AARO, after AAWSAP was cancelled, the AATIP name was used by some people in an informal, unofficial UAP “community of interest” inside DoD that researched military UAP sightings as ancillary work, without dedicated personnel or budget. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

For readers judging Green, this means the label “AATIP-linked” needs careful handling. It may refer to the DIA-funded AAWSAP contract, the later informal AATIP-branded UAP network, the post-2017 media narrative, or a mixture of all three. Green’s most concrete link is not a command role in AATIP, but his DIA-released biological-effects paper within the AAWSAP/AATIP research ecosystem. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

Where Green fitted into AAWSAP

Green’s best-documented AAWSAP-related contribution is the DIA-released paper titled “Anomalous Acute and Subacute Field Effects on Human Biological Tissues”. The document says it was prepared for a programme whose objective was to understand the physics and engineering of advanced aerospace weapons-system applications through roughly 2050, and that Green’s study addressed clinical signs, symptoms and biophysics of injury from unintended exposure to anomalous systems. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

The paper is striking because it gives a medical and forensic frame to close-encounter claims. It discusses alleged injury patterns, electromagnetic radiation field effects, heating and burn injuries, neurological effects, auditory effects and possible links between clinical diagnoses and environmental conditions during anomalous events. It also argues that studying injuries could help infer physical characteristics of advanced aerospace systems of unknown provenance. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

That does not mean the paper proves UFO-caused injury. Its language is stronger than the public evidence can bear. It states that historical cases show humans injured by “anomalous vehicles”, especially airborne ones, and that enough incidents and medical data supported a hypothesis that some advanced systems were already deployed and opaque to full US understanding. But the paper’s evidential base included a mixture of peer-reviewed medical literature, declassified material, unpublished cases and UFO-associated reports, so the chain of custody is uneven. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

Green later gave a more cautious account in an interview reported by The UFO Trail. He said he was not part of BAASS or AAWSAP but was a consultant, and he resisted treating the cited UFO stories as necessarily valid. He also said the work was “hypothesis generation, not hypothesis testing”, and that he did not regard the material as a large, bundled scientific data set. That later caveat matters: it narrows the strongest reasonable claim from “Green proved UAP injuries” to “Green explored whether some reported injuries could be clinically characterised and used to generate testable hypotheses.” [UFO Trail]ufotrail.blogspot.comUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn'tUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn't

This is the main credibility tension. Green’s professional background makes him more capable than most UFO commentators of assessing neurological or forensic-medical material. But the AAWSAP setting did not, by itself, turn case reports into validated epidemiology, controlled exposure science, or proof of non-human technology. His contribution is serious enough to merit attention, but not strong enough to carry the extraordinary conclusions sometimes attached to it in UAP media. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

Why the programme’s scope is contested

The central dispute is not whether AAWSAP existed. It did. The dispute is what it was really doing, who authorised what, and whether its UFO and paranormal work was an intended national-security effort or a contractor-driven expansion beyond the formal aerospace-threat task.

AARO’s 2024 review says the primary purpose of AAWSAP/AATIP was to investigate next-generation aerospace technologies in 12 specific areas, including advanced lift, propulsion, unconventional materials and signature reduction. But it also says UFO/UAP investigation was not specifically outlined in the contract’s statement of work, even though the private-sector organisation conducted UFO research with support from the DIA programme manager. That work allegedly included reviewing new cases and older Project Blue Book cases, running debriefing and investigation teams, and proposing laboratories to examine any recovered UFO materials. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

AARO went further. It said AAWSAP/AATIP investigated an alleged UAP and paranormal hotspot at a Utah property owned by the head of the private-sector organisation, examining reports of “shadow figures”, “creatures”, remote viewing, human-consciousness anomalies and even plans to hire psychics to study supposed inter-dimensional phenomena. AARO’s judgement was that DIA did not seek or specifically authorise that work, even though a DIA employee set up and managed the contract. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

Popular Mechanics reached a different emphasis from leaked or obtained BAASS material. It reported that BAASS’s July 2009 “Ten Month Report” was filled with UAP-related content: biological effects, physical signatures, detection methods, witness interviews, photographs, case summaries, Skinwalker Ranch as a possible laboratory, disclosure forums, a proposed medical-physiological UAP effects programme and Project Blue Book material. Its reporting supports the view that, whatever the formal aerospace wording, BAASS was deeply engaged with UFO and anomalous-phenomena material. [Popular Mechanics]popularmechanics.comPopular Mechanics Are UFOs Real?Popular Mechanics Are UFOs Real?

These two accounts are not entirely incompatible. They describe the same governance problem from different angles. Formally, AAWSAP was sold and managed as advanced aerospace threat research. Operationally, a large part of the contractor culture appears to have treated UAP, human effects and Skinwalker-style anomalies as relevant to that mission. The question is whether that was visionary interdisciplinary threat assessment or a poorly controlled blending of national security, UFO belief and paranormal speculation. The public record does not resolve that question in favour of believers; it shows that the blending happened. [defense]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1 Intelligence Agency [2U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

What official reviews later criticised

AARO’s historical review is the most important official critique because it was written after renewed congressional attention to UAP and after AARO had reviewed government records, archives, interviews and oversight channels. It found no evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review panel had confirmed that a UAP sighting represented extraterrestrial technology. It also said it found no empirical evidence that the US government had recovered extraterrestrial beings or craft. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

For AAWSAP/AATIP specifically, AARO’s criticism had three parts. First, it said the scientific papers were exploratory and were never thoroughly peer reviewed. Second, it had not uncovered other substantive UAP case work by AAWSAP/AATIP beyond review of Project Blue Book and private cases, interviews with observers and unrelated paranormal work at the Utah property. Third, it said AAWSAP/AATIP was terminated in 2012 after completion of deliverables because of DIA and DoD concerns about the project. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

The Special Access Program issue also matters. In June 2009, Senator Reid asked that AAWSAP/AATIP be made a DoD Special Access Program. AARO says Deputy Secretary William Lynn declined, based on a recommendation from then-Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence James Clapper that such a designation was not justified. This weakens the common inference that AAWSAP’s sensitive flavour means it was accepted into the highest tier of validated secret UFO work. The record shows an attempt to elevate it, followed by refusal. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

AARO also linked AAWSAP/AATIP to the later KONA BLUE proposal, a proposed Department of Homeland Security effort that would have restarted UAP investigations, paranormal research and possible reverse-engineering of any recovered off-world spacecraft advocates hoped to acquire. According to AARO, KONA BLUE gained some initial traction as a prospective Special Access Program but was rejected by DHS leadership for lacking merit; no extraterrestrial craft or bodies were collected, and no material was transferred to DHS. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

This is where AAWSAP most sharply affects Green’s credibility. His paper sits inside a programme later criticised not merely for being speculative, but for weak review, disputed authorisation, paranormal expansion and unsuccessful attempts to secure more protected programme status. That does not discredit every technical contributor automatically. It does mean that the programme’s existence cannot be used as a shortcut for proof.

What this means for judging Kit Green

The fairest reading is that Green’s AAWSAP-related work is evidence of participation in a real, government-funded research ecosystem, not evidence that the ecosystem reached sound conclusions about UAP origin. He contributed a medically framed paper on alleged field effects and human tissues; that paper became part of the AAWSAP/AATIP documentary trail; and the topic fits his broader background in medicine, neurophysiology, forensic assessment and intelligence-linked anomaly research. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

The strongest pro-Green argument is that his role was technically specific. He was not simply repeating UFO lore in popular form. He was asking whether claimed close-encounter injuries could be mapped against known mechanisms such as electromagnetic radiation, thermal effects, neurological symptoms and exposure patterns. In a defence context, that is not inherently absurd: pilots, engineers and soldiers can be injured by radiation, directed energy, microwave systems, industrial accidents or classified technologies, even when witnesses misinterpret what they encountered. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

The strongest sceptical argument is that the surrounding programme culture was unusually vulnerable to confirmation bias. When a contract formally framed as future aerospace threat assessment also pursues Skinwalker Ranch anomalies, remote viewing, psychics, recovered-material ideas and public-relations proposals assuming extraterrestrial visitation, a medical paper inside that ecosystem needs especially careful evidential scrutiny. AARO’s finding that the papers were not thoroughly peer reviewed makes that scrutiny even more necessary. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

Green’s later comments help more than they hurt, because they show some awareness of the difference between clinical case material and validated science. Reported remarks that he did not treat the UFO stories as necessarily valid, that he was generating hypotheses rather than testing them, and that he was not presenting a large unified data set make his position more cautious than the most dramatic readings of the DIA paper. But those caveats also reduce the value of the paper as hard UAP evidence. [UFO Trail]ufotrail.blogspot.comUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn'tUFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn't

The practical conclusion is therefore balanced. AAWSAP and AATIP strengthen the claim that Green operated near serious institutional channels where UAP-adjacent questions were funded, documented and discussed. They weaken any claim that his work should be treated as independently validated proof of exotic craft, alien technology or a hidden recovery programme. The context makes Green relevant; it does not make the strongest UFO conclusions reliable.

The credibility lesson from AAWSAP

AAWSAP shows why “government-funded” is not the same as “government-confirmed”. The programme had real money, real contracts, real reports and real intelligence-community involvement. It also appears to have had blurry boundaries, contested names, inconsistent public explanations, speculative deliverables and a contractor environment that mixed aerospace forecasting with UFO and paranormal claims. [defense]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1 Intelligence Agency [2U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

For Kit Green, the lesson is especially important because his UAP reputation often depends on institutional proximity. His background and AAWSAP-linked work justify taking him more seriously than a casual witness or media pundit. But the same record demands caution: credentials, classified-adjacent settings and official contracts can coexist with weak evidence, speculative assumptions and disputed oversight.

The most defensible assessment is that Green’s AAWSAP role belongs in the category of credible participation in a disputed programme, not confirmed disclosure. His biological-effects paper is a meaningful historical document in UAP studies, but its value is mainly as a window into how one government-funded network tried to medicalise anomalous encounter claims. It is not, on the current public record, a settled demonstration that UAP injured people through non-human propulsion, or that AAWSAP uncovered technology beyond ordinary human origin.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Where Did Green Fit Into AAWSAP?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Phenomena

By Annie Jacobsen

Provides context for government involvement in anomalous research.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Explains why government-linked UAP programs attracted attention.

See on Amazon

Book

The Pentagon's Brain

By Annie Jacobsen

Offers institutional context for secretive defense research efforts.

See on Amazon

Book

Skinwalkers at the Pentagon

By James T Lacatski D.Eng., James T. Lacatski et al.

Focuses on AAWSAP, AATIP and associated personnel.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: Phenomena UFOs The Pentagon's Brain

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Endnotes

1. Source: media.defense.gov
   Title: U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1
   Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

2. Source: dia.mil
   Title: Defense Intelligence Agency
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170018/

3. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
   Title: The Black Vault
   Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_26-DIRD_Anomalous_Acute_and_Subacute_Field_Effects_on_Human_Biological_Tissues.pdf

4. Source: dia.mil
   Title: File Id
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170026/

5. Source: dia.mil
   Title: File Id
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170015/

6. Source: dia.mil
   Title: FY 2023 FOIA Log
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/Portals/110/FY%202023%20FOIA%20Log.pdf

7. Source: dia.mil
   Title: FOIA Request Log 2018
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/Portals/110/Documents/FOIA/All%20PDFs/FOIA_Request_Log_2018.pdf

8. Source: war.gov
   Title: dod working to better understand resolve anomalous phenomena
   Link: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/

9. Source: space.com
   Title: ufo pentagon history channel
   Link: https://www.space.com/ufo-pentagon-history-channel.html

10. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf

11. Source: ufotrail.blogspot.com
    Title: UFO Trail The UFO Trail: The UFO Injury Study That Wasn’t
    Link: https://ufotrail.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-ufo-injury-study-that-wasnt.html

12. Source: fas.org
    Title: Federation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
    Link: https://fas.org/publication/aatip-list/

13. Source: popularmechanics.com
    Title: Popular Mechanics Are UFOs Real?
    Link: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a30916275/government-secret-ufo-program-investigation/

14. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Luis Elizondo
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Elizondo

15. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: the advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-advanced-aviation-threat-identification-program-aatip-dird-report-research/

16. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/20-F-1095.pdf

17. Source: locationsunknown.org
    Title: Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DRIDs)On
    Link: https://locationsunknown.org/foia-reading-room/the-deep-end/ufos-aliens/defense-intelligence-reference-documents

18. Source: popularmechanics.com
    Title: government report non man made ufos
    Link: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a40992477/government-report-non-man-made-ufos/

19. Source: popularmechanics.com
    Title: pain relief
    Link: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a64954563/pain-relief/

20. Source: popularmechanics.com
    Title: army ufo mysterious technology
    Link: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a29504031/army-ufo-mysterious-technology/

21. Source: journalofscientificexploration.org
    Link: https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/3541/2229

22. Source: defensescoop.com
    Title: uap ufo disclosure advocates transparency drone incursions
    Link: https://defensescoop.com/2025/03/31/uap-ufo-disclosure-advocates-transparency-drone-incursions/

23. Source: bjsm.bmj.com
    Link: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/50/5/273

Additional References

1. Source: arxiv.org
   Link: https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06794v2

2. Source: arxiv.org
   Link: https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06794v1

3. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Archives of the Impossible conference | Flash Talk: Colm A. Kelleher
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD0ZVbtbnfI
   Source snippet

   A Secret Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Secret government UFO program reveals paranormal events
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36_LRMHZouw
   Source snippet

   The UFO Lie: Shocking truth of Pentagon AAWSAP program | The Basement Office...

5. Source: sam.gov
   Link: https://sam.gov/opp/2e30b8192aaa2fb3f32c1497570cbcad/view

6. Source: youtube.com
   Title: A Secret Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UckV2rmgcbA
   Source snippet

   Secret government UFO program reveals paranormal events...

7. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSMelbourne/posts/theres-a-lot-of-negative-health-effects-that-have-now-been-revealed-by-the-secre/10160491814924301/

8. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/EconomicTimes/posts/they-saw-green-orbs-new-ufo-files-released-by-the-war-department-spark-massive-a/1472201661602404/

9. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/Fox8NewsCleveland/posts/162-files-have-dropped-on-a-new-government-page-on-unidentified-aerial-phenomena/1562134075498760/

10. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403646803_A_Medical_Review_of_Human_Injuries_from_Unidentified_Aerial_Phenomena