Within Davis
How Media Coverage Changed Davis's Reputation
Reporting helped move Davis from specialist circles into mainstream UAP debate, sometimes faster than the evidence could support.
On this page
- From technical consultant to public UAP figure
- Headlines, caveats and quotation gaps
- How repetition hardens uncertain claims
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Media coverage changed Eric Davis’s UAP reputation by turning a niche technical consultant into a recognisable figure in the modern UFO/UAP debate. The shift did not happen because new public evidence proved his most extraordinary claims. It happened because a small number of high-impact reports placed his name beside phrases such as “Pentagon UFO programme”, “classified briefing”, “off-world vehicles” and “reverse-engineering”. Those phrases travelled faster than the caveats around them. The result is a reputation with two layers: Davis is verifiably connected to defence-adjacent speculative aerospace work, but the public image built around him often exceeds what the available evidence can safely support. [GV Wire]gvwire.comSource details in endnotes. [Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOsFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
That distinction matters because Davis’s credibility is frequently judged through repetition rather than evidence. Once a claim appears in a major outlet, is summarised by secondary sites, quoted on social media, and folded into later documentaries or congressional-discourse narratives, readers can easily mistake prominence for corroboration. In Davis’s case, media amplification made him seem less like one source in a contested chain and more like a confirmed insider whose statements had already been institutionally validated.
From technical consultant to public UAP figure
Before the wider media cycle, Davis’s public profile was mostly technical and specialist. He was known in circles interested in advanced propulsion, general relativity and highly speculative aerospace concepts. That background is documentable. The Defense Intelligence Agency released a Defense Intelligence Reference Document titled Traversable Wormholes, Stargates, and Negative Energy, authored by Eric W. Davis for EarthTech International, as part of the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications programme. The paper discusses faster-than-light spacetime concepts, exotic matter and negative energy; it is speculative physics, not public proof of UAP recovery. [defense]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024 Intelligence Agency [Defense Intelligence Agency]dia.milSource details in endnotes.
This distinction was blurred in public discussion after the DIA’s list of AATIP/AAWSAP-related research titles became news. The Federation of American Scientists noted in 2019 that the DIA had funded work on “warp drive, invisibility cloaking” and other fringe or speculative areas, and specifically named Davis’s wormhole paper as one of the funded titles. That reporting helped make Davis’s work visible beyond propulsion and fringe-science communities, but it also created a headline-friendly bridge between “government-funded speculative study” and “Pentagon UFO expert”. [Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOsFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
The Black Vault’s FOIA archive then reinforced the document trail by publishing and organising the DIA Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. Its archive notes that a leaked version of 38 reports appeared in 2018, that a DIA list followed in 2019, and that by March 2022 all but one of the 38 reports had been officially released through FOIA. This gave researchers and journalists a real paper trail to cite when discussing Davis. Yet the same archive also underlines a key limitation: these were advanced-technology reports, not recovered-craft evidence. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comSource details in endnotes.
Media amplification therefore began from a partly solid foundation. Davis was not invented by the press, and his defence-adjacent technical work was not imaginary. The problem was interpretive: technical authorship in a speculative government-funded programme became a credential that later coverage could attach to much stronger claims about crash retrievals, off-world materials and secret programmes.
The “off-world vehicles” moment
The clearest media inflection point came in July 2020, when reporting associated Davis with a classified briefing and the phrase “off-world vehicles not made on this earth”. A reprint of the New York Times report states that Davis, described as an astrophysicist who had worked as a subcontractor and consultant for the Pentagon UFO programme since 2007, said some material examinations had not determined a source and led him to conclude, “We couldn’t make it ourselves.” The same report said he had given a classified briefing in March to a Defense Department agency about retrievals from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.” [GV Wire]gvwire.comSource details in endnotes.
That sentence did enormous reputational work. It compressed several uncertain elements into one memorable image: a scientist, the Pentagon, classified briefings, recovered material, and non-human technology. For supporters, it suggested Davis was a rare technically literate insider willing to say publicly what others would only whisper. For sceptics, it was a warning sign that dramatic claims were being circulated without public physical evidence, test data, chain of custody, or independent confirmation.
Secondary coverage made the amplification stronger. New York Magazine summarised the claim under the headline that the Pentagon had reportedly found “off-world vehicles not made on this Earth” and described Davis’s phrase as a “bombshell quote”. It also noted that the relevant New York Times passage grouped Davis with former officials and scientists “without presenting physical proof” who were convinced that objects of undetermined origin had crashed and been studied. That caveat was important, but the headline and the quotable phrase were far more portable than the evidential warning. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From EarthNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From Earth
This is how Davis’s media reputation hardened. The most shareable version was not “a consultant made a claim about a classified briefing that the public cannot inspect”. It was “a Pentagon physicist says off-world vehicles exist”. The difference is not minor. One formulation describes a source claim; the other sounds like a finding.
Headlines, caveats and quotation gaps
Davis’s UAP reputation shows how media systems can preserve a quote while losing its evidential frame. The core claims attached to him often depend on unavailable information: classified briefings, unnamed programmes, unnamed materials, and alleged testimony from other people. Those limits are not necessarily proof that the claims are false, but they do mean the public cannot evaluate them in the same way it could evaluate a released laboratory report, procurement record, sworn transcript, or documented chain of custody.
The 2020 coverage did include caveats. It described a small group of former officials and scientists saying they were convinced of crash retrievals “without presenting physical proof”, and it reported former Senator Harry Reid’s position in more cautious terms: Reid believed crashes of unknown objects may have occurred and that any recovered materials should be studied, not that he had confirmed decades of secret study. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From EarthNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From Earth
But caveats have weak afterlives. Headlines, screenshots and short posts usually carry the dramatic line, not the qualifiers. In Davis’s case, the words “classified briefing” also created a credibility loop. The lack of public evidence could be framed by supporters as what one would expect if the matter were classified, while sceptics could point to the same absence as the central evidential failure. Media coverage did not resolve that tension; it made the tension more visible and more emotionally charged.
| The official context around UAP also helped the story travel. In August 2020, the Department of Defense announced the establishment of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, saying it would detect, analyse and catalogue UAP that could pose a national security threat. That announcement gave the wider UAP topic a legitimate national-security frame, even though it did not validate Davis’s strongest claims about off-world vehicles or crash retrievals. [U.S. Department of War]war.govEstablishment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force > U.S. Department of War > Release | U.S. Department of War…</span></span></span>(#endnote-3 “Snippet: Establishment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force > U.S. Department of War > Release | U.S. Department of War”) |
The 2021 ODNI preliminary assessment added another layer. It said the limited amount of high-quality reporting hampered firm conclusions, that most reported UAP probably represented physical objects, and that some incidents appeared to show unusual flight characteristics requiring further analysis. It did not endorse extraterrestrial technology, but it did keep UAP in official discourse. For Davis’s media reputation, that was useful background: official uncertainty around UAP made extraordinary claims seem less dismissible, even when those specific claims remained unproven. [DNI]dni.govPrelimary Assessment UAP 20210625Prelimary Assessment UAP 20210625
How repetition hardens uncertain claims
The most important media mechanism in Davis’s case is repetition across different levels of credibility. A claim may begin as a sourced but unverified statement in a major newspaper, then be summarised by magazines, cable segments, podcasts, Reddit threads, documentaries and advocacy sites. Each repetition can make the claim feel more established, even when no new evidence has been added.
Davis benefits from what might be called credential stacking. He is presented as a physicist, a defence contractor, a former Pentagon UFO-programme consultant, an author of DIA-linked advanced aerospace studies, and a person associated with classified briefings. Each credential has some basis, but the stack can imply more than the components prove. A reader may move too quickly from “he worked around government-funded speculative aerospace studies” to “he has verified knowledge of recovered non-human craft”.
This is especially visible in the way the Wilson-Davis memo is discussed. The memo, hosted publicly on DocumentCloud, is often treated in UFO circles as a central artefact because it purports to record a 2002 conversation between Davis and Admiral Thomas Wilson about inaccessible reverse-engineering programmes. Its public existence is real; its contents, authorship history, chain of custody and factual accuracy remain contested. The media effect is that Davis’s name becomes attached not only to the 2020 “off-world vehicles” quote but also to a document that seems, to believers, to fit the same hidden-programme narrative. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgSource details in endnotes.
Later coverage widened this effect. The Washington Post’s reporting on The Age of Disclosure described Davis as the author of the Wilson-Davis memo in the context of a documentary built around claims of a long-running UAP cover-up. The Guardian’s coverage of the same film noted that figures including Puthoff and Davis confidently assert extraterrestrial interference on Earth, but also stressed that this was presented without documentation. Those pieces show how Davis had moved from a specialist source to part of a recognisable cast of modern disclosure figures. [The Washington Post]washingtonpost.comSource details in endnotes.
The problem is not that media should ignore Davis. His role is relevant to the modern UAP story. The problem is that repetition can make unresolved claims feel settled. A name recurring across the New York Times, FOIA archives, documentaries and congressional-adjacent debate can acquire an aura of confirmation even when each individual item still rests on limited or disputed evidence.
Later official responses narrowed the evidential space
The strongest corrective to Davis’s amplified reputation came from later official review, especially AARO’s 2024 historical report. AARO said it reviewed records, documents, classified and unclassified archives, open-source analysis, oral-history interviews and interviews with current and former officials. Its executive summary stated that it found no evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review panel had confirmed a UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology. It also said it found no empirical evidence that the US government or private companies had been reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. [AARO]aaro.milUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical ReportUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical Report [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
That finding does not automatically disprove every private claim Davis has made or relayed. It does, however, weaken the public version of his reputation when that reputation is framed as if official validation already exists. AARO’s report specifically addressed claims involving named people, locations, technological tests and documents allegedly related to reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology, saying such claims were inaccurate based on information available to it. It also reported that executives, scientists and chief technology officers of named companies denied recovering, possessing or reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
AARO also discussed KONA BLUE, a proposed UAP recovery and reverse-engineering programme that had been brought to its attention by interviewees. According to the report, KONA BLUE advocates believed the US government was hiding UAP technologies, but no extraterrestrial craft or bodies were ever collected; the material was assumed to exist. The proposed programme was never approved or stood up, and no data or material was transferred. This matters for Davis’s media reputation because it shows how a proposal, belief, or anticipated recovery structure can later be mistaken in public discourse for evidence that such materials had actually been obtained. [AARO]aaro.milUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical ReportUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical Report
AARO also directly addressed the media environment, saying that television programmes, books, films, internet content and social media had influenced public conversation and reinforced UAP beliefs among some groups. It warned of circular reporting and the rapid spread of misinformation. That critique maps closely onto Davis’s case: the same claims can pass through official-sounding, journalistic, documentary and online channels until readers lose sight of where the evidence begins and ends. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
Supporter and sceptic readings of the same coverage
Supporters and sceptics tend to read Davis’s media rise in opposite ways.
Supporters see the coverage as evidence that Davis is not a random UFO personality. They point to his technical background, his DIA-linked research, his reported work around AAWSAP/AATIP, his association with figures such as Hal Puthoff, and his alleged access to classified briefings. From this viewpoint, the caution in mainstream reporting reflects classification and institutional reluctance, not weakness in the underlying claims. The fact that Davis’s name appears in official-document ecosystems and major media coverage is treated as a sign that he is close to the real story.
Sceptics see the same pattern as a case study in how fringe or weakly evidenced claims gain authority. They do not deny that Davis wrote speculative papers or moved in defence-adjacent circles. Their objection is that those facts are being used to support much larger claims that remain unverified. Skeptical Inquirer criticised the New York Times’ presentation of Davis as an authority for claims about alien material and drew attention to earlier controversial work linked to psychic teleportation. The Federation of American Scientists similarly framed the DIA-funded research list as highly conjectural and beyond normal scientific or military-intelligence boundaries. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer UFOs Come Out of the Shadows. Again. PerhapsSkeptical Inquirer UFOs Come Out of the Shadows. Again. Perhaps
The fairest assessment sits between those readings. Media coverage did not fabricate Davis’s relevance, but it did magnify the most dramatic interpretation of that relevance. His verified paper trail makes him more significant than a casual commentator. His unverified crash-retrieval and off-world-material associations remain much weaker than his media profile can make them appear.
What media amplification changed
Media amplification changed Davis’s reputation in three practical ways.
First, it made him legible to a mainstream audience. Without the 2017–2020 UAP news cycle, Davis might have remained known mainly to propulsion enthusiasts, UFO researchers and people tracking AAWSAP/AATIP documents. After the “off-world vehicles” coverage, his name became attached to one of the most memorable phrases in modern UAP discourse. [GV Wire]gvwire.comSource details in endnotes.
Second, it shifted the burden of interpretation. Instead of asking, “What exactly has Davis documented?”, many readers encountered him through the stronger question, “Why would a Pentagon-linked physicist say this unless there was something there?” That framing favours authority, access and secrecy over publicly inspectable evidence.
Third, it created a reputational lag. Later official reviews, including AARO’s negative findings on extraterrestrial technology and reverse-engineering claims, have not erased the earlier media imprint. For many readers, the 2020 phrase remains more memorable than the 2024 evidential caveat. That is the central lesson of Davis’s media role: first impressions in high-profile UAP coverage can outlast later narrowing, correction or official scepticism. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
Credibility takeaway
Media coverage elevated Eric Davis because he sits at a rare intersection: real speculative aerospace credentials, documented links to government-funded advanced-technology studies, association with AAWSAP/AATIP circles, and dramatic claims about hidden UAP material. That combination is highly newsworthy. It is also easy to overread.
The strongest verified claim is that Davis was part of a defence-adjacent research and consulting world that produced speculative studies for official programmes. The weaker claim is that his public statements or alleged briefings establish the existence of recovered off-world vehicles or secret reverse-engineering programmes. Major media helped move the second claim into mainstream conversation, but later official review has not publicly substantiated it. [defense]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024 Intelligence Agency [Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOsFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
Davis’s amplified reputation is therefore best treated as a signal of influence, not proof of accuracy. The media made him important to the UAP debate; it did not make his most extraordinary claims established fact.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Media Coverage Changed Davis's Reputation. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
American Cosmic
Directly addresses how media, technology, and culture amplify UFO narratives.
Manufacturing Consent
Provides tools for understanding amplification, framing, and public perception.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Unclassified Final DSD AARO Historical Report
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf -
Source: dia.mil
Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170048/ -
Source: war.gov
Title: U.S. Department of War
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/release/article/2314065/establishment-of-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-task-force/Source snippet
Establishment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force > U.S. Department of War > Release | U.S. Department of War...
-
Source: dni.gov
Title: Prelimary Assessment UAP 20210625
Link: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assessment-UAP-20210625.pdf -
Source: dni.gov
Link: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2021/3550-preliminary-assessment-unidentified-aerial-phenomena -
Source: documentcloud.org
Link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6185702-Eric-Davis-meeting-with-Adm-Wilson/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/hx4jab/pentagon_has_offworld_vehicles_not_made_on_this/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f5ede9/eric_davis_appears_to_admit_writing_wilsondavis/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/oq4men/off_world_vehicles_not_made_of_this_earth_dr_eric/ -
Source: reddit.com
Title: what happened to the off world vehicles not made
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/v759zn/what_happened_to_the_off_world_vehicles_not_made/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/14iev82/okay_this_is_interesting_but_very_technical_a/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16hs3hl/heres_what_hal_puthoff_and_eric_davis_are_working/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/suh1ns/i_went_on_arxiv_and_found_some_of_the_full_text/ -
Source: reddit.com
Title: the dia reading room just dropped over 1500 pages
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ewlvql/the_dia_reading_room_just_dropped_over_1500_pages/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/vpq33f/in_light_of_keith_kloors_hit_piece_on_dr_travis/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1h02x1h/jacques_vallee_the_legendary_ufo_researcher_in/ -
Source: reddit.com
Title: comparison analysis of june 2021 preliminary
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/tnpgww/comparison_analysis_of_june_2021_preliminary/
Published: june 2021 -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF -
Source: dni.gov
Title: DF 2021 00275 Preliminary Assessment Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Link: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/DF-2021-00275-Preliminary-Assessment-Unidentified-Aerial-Phenomena.pdf -
Source: archive.org
Link: https://archive.org/stream/traversable-wormholes-stargates-negative-energy-001-2/traversable-wormholes–stargates—-negative-energy001%20%282%29_djvu.txt -
Source: dia.mil
Title: FOIA Request Log 2022
Link: https://www.dia.mil/Portals/110/Documents/FOIA/All%20PDFs/FOIA_Request_Log_2022.pdf -
Source: dia.mil
Title: File Id
Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170027/ -
Source: earthtech.org
Link: https://www.earthtech.org/publications/teleportation_via_Wormhole-Stargates_Eric_Davis.pdf -
Source: gvwire.com
Link: https://gvwire.com/2020/07/23/not-made-of-this-earth-pentagons-u-f-o-unit-directed-to-make-some-findings-public/ -
Source: fas.org
Title: Federation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
Link: https://fas.org/publication/aatip-list/ -
Source: theblackvault.com
Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-advanced-aviation-threat-identification-program-aatip-dird-report-research/ -
Source: nymag.com
Title: New York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From Earth
Link: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/ufo-report-pentagon-has-off-world-vehicles-not-from-earth.html -
Source: washingtonpost.com
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/movies/2025/03/11/ufos-aliens-age-of-disclosure/ -
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer UFOs Come Out of the Shadows. Again. Perhaps
Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2020/11/ufos-come-out-of-the-shadows-again-perhaps/ -
Source: locationsunknown.org
Title: Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DRIDs)On
Link: https://locationsunknown.org/foia-reading-room/the-deep-end/ufos-aliens/defense-intelligence-reference-documents -
Source: documents3.theblackvault.com
Title: Records pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
Link: https://documents3.theblackvault.com/documents/cbp/Records%20pertaining%20to%20Unidentified%20Aerial%20Phenomenon.pdf -
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Title: FOIA 00159 2018
Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/FOIA%2000159-2018.pdf -
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Title: DIRD 13 DIRD Warp Drive Dark energy and the Manipulation of Extra Dimensions
Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_13-DIRD_Warp_Drive_Dark_energy_and_the_Manipulation_of_Extra_Dimensions.pdf -
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Title: UAPTFHPSCIBrief Redacted
Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/UAPTFHPSCIBriefRedacted.pdf -
Source: navy.mil
Title: establishment of unidentified aerial phenomena task force
Link: https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/2314280/establishment-of-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-task-force/ -
Source: pdfcoffee.com
Link: https://pdfcoffee.com/defense-intelligence-reference-document-pdf-free.html -
Source: skeptic.com
Title: ufology from fringe to mainstream to fringe
Link: https://www.skeptic.com/article/ufology-from-fringe-to-mainstream-to-fringe/
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Understanding the AAWSAP and AATIP Credibility Cycle
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h9VqjPZ_7ESource snippet
Examining the Role of Insiders in Modern UAP Narratives...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/Discovery/posts/aatip-stands-for-advanced-aerospace-threat-identification-program-and-its-very-r/10157346249393586/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/SteveBartlettShow/posts/a-few-days-ago-161-classified-uap-files-were-released-to-the-public-that-include/1531892531652951/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/KFOXTV/posts/a-new-batch-of-declassified-pentagon-ufo-materials-is-fueling-fresh-public-fasci/1413062624191797/ -
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353539589_Analysis_of_ODNI_Preliminary_Assessment_Unidentified_Aerial_Phenomena -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/fox5dc/posts/dr-hal-puthoff-claims-the-us-has-recovered-the-remains-of-four-separate-species-/1463366465827909/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/techexplorerzone/posts/1555998789275934/ -
Source: scribd.com
Link: https://www.scribd.com/document/739477728/EricWDavis-FTLSpaceWarps-StarShipCongress2013 -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/Amazing.Science.Factss/posts/former-cia-contractor-hal-puthoff-claimed-on-a-podcast-that-the-united-states-ha/1299094989002843/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/fossbytes/posts/former-cia-researcher-hal-puthoff-claimed-the-us-recovered-4-alien-species-from-/1434367868731253/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Parent topic
DavisRelated pages 7
- AAWSAP Links Do Pentagon Links Prove Too Much?
- Debate Why Reasonable Readers Split On Davis
- DIA Papers What Do The DIA Papers Really Show?
- Off World Claim What About The Off World Vehicles Claim?
- Source Type Was Davis A Witness Or A Messenger?
- Verified Work What Can Actually Be Verified?
- Wilson Memo Why The Wilson Davis Memo Still Divides Readers