Within Remote Viewing
Did the Nature paper prove anything?
The 1974 Nature paper made Puthoff's remote-viewing work harder to dismiss, but its cautious wording left the core claim unsettled.
On this page
- What the 1974 paper actually claimed
- Why publication boosted Puthoff's standing
- Where cautious language left uncertainty
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The 1974 Nature paper associated with Hal Puthoff remains one of the strongest pieces of evidence used by supporters when arguing that his early remote-viewing work was taken seriously by mainstream institutions. It did not prove that psychic perception was real, nor did it settle the scientific debate. What it did achieve was something more limited but still important: it moved remote-viewing claims out of the realm of tabloid stories and into one of the world’s most prestigious scientific journals. That publication gave Puthoff and his Stanford Research Institute (SRI) research programme a level of visibility and credibility that few paranormal investigations ever received. [Nature]nature.comRUSSELL TARG &; HAROLD PUTHOFF. Nature volume 251, pages 602–607 (…Read more…
The credibility question is therefore not whether the paper existed or whether it mattered. Both points are clear. The real question is what the paper actually claimed, how much weight publication in Nature should carry, and why later criticism prevented it from becoming a lasting scientific validation of remote viewing.
What the 1974 paper actually claimed
In October 1974, Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff published a paper in Nature titled Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. The paper described experiments conducted at SRI involving individuals who allegedly obtained information about distant targets while isolated from ordinary sensory cues. The researchers reported results that they believed were difficult to explain through conventional means. [Nature]nature.comnature18 Oct 1974 — WE publish this week a paper by Drs R. Targ and H. Puthoff (page 602) which is bound to create something of.Read more…
The wording of the paper is often overlooked in later retellings. The authors did not announce that psychic functioning had been conclusively demonstrated. Instead, they stated that their experiments produced results “suggesting” the existence of an anomalous perceptual process. That cautious language reflected a standard scientific practice: reporting observed effects without claiming that all alternative explanations had been eliminated. [Nature]nature.comNatureNatureFirst published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-re…
Several experiments discussed in the paper involved Uri Geller, whose apparent paranormal abilities had already attracted international attention. The researchers argued that, under controlled conditions, Geller appeared capable of reproducing drawings or describing information that he should not have been able to access through normal sensory channels. The paper also discussed experiments involving other subjects and target-identification procedures intended to reduce ordinary information leakage. Nature [2irenaroglic.si]irenaroglic.siinformation transmission under conditions of sensory shieldingby HE Puthoff · 1974 · Cited by 359 — Uri Geller in which we examined his a…
For supporters, the key point was straightforward: respected researchers at a major research institution had reported statistically unusual results and had persuaded Nature’s editors and reviewers that the work deserved publication. For critics, publication meant only that the experiments were interesting enough to discuss publicly, not that the underlying paranormal interpretation had been established.
Why publication boosted Puthoff’s standing
The importance of the paper was institutional as much as scientific.
At the time, paranormal research was often dismissed without serious engagement. A paper appearing in Nature instantly changed the conversation. It signalled that the work was worthy of scrutiny by the broader scientific community rather than being confined to occult publications or fringe newsletters. [Nature]nature.comNatureInformation transmission in remote viewing experimentsby D MARKS · 1978 · Cited by 50 — TARG AND PUTHOFF 1–3 have described investi…
Several credibility effects followed:
- Association with a leading journal: Nature was already one of the world’s most influential scientific publications. Having a paper accepted there gave Puthoff and Targ a level of legitimacy unavailable to most parapsychology researchers. [Nature]nature.comRemote viewing exposedby D MARKS · 1986 · Cited by 18 — Targ, R. & Puthoff, H. Nature 251, 602–607 (1974). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar…
- Visibility inside government circles: The publication arrived during a period of Cold War concern about possible Soviet research into psychic phenomena. A peer-reviewed paper in a major journal made it easier for officials to justify continued interest in the topic. Declassified CIA records later circulated versions of the work and discussed the research programme. [CIA]cia.govCIACIA-RDP79-00999A000200010002-3In certain situations significant information transmission can take place under shielded conditions. Fac… [CIA]cia.govINFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF…INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SENSORY SHIELDING by Dr. Harold E. Puthoff a…
- Protection against immediate dismissal: Critics could attack the conclusions, but they could not simply claim the research never existed or had never undergone peer review. The publication became a permanent reference point in debates over remote viewing. [Nature]nature.comRebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experimentsby H PUTHOFF · 1981 · Cited by 16 — Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experime…
For assessing Puthoff’s later credibility in UFO and UAP discussions, this matters because it established a recurring theme. He was not merely a promoter of speculative ideas from outside professional science. He had participated in research that reached major institutions, attracted government funding and appeared in elite journals. Supporters continue to cite that history as evidence that he should not be dismissed as a purely fringe figure.
Why a Nature publication was not the same as proof
One of the most common misunderstandings is the belief that publication in Nature automatically validated remote viewing.
Scientific journals do not certify that every published conclusion is correct. They publish research that reviewers consider significant, methodologically interesting or worthy of debate. Especially in controversial fields, publication can be an invitation for further testing rather than a final verdict.
The 1974 paper immediately attracted attention because the claims were extraordinary. Under the usual standards of science, extraordinary claims require especially strong evidence and successful replication. Publication therefore marked the beginning of a larger argument rather than the end of one. [Nature]nature.orgervation in more than 80 countries and territories.Read more…
This distinction became increasingly important as critics attempted to repeat or analyse the experiments. The existence of a Nature paper demonstrated that something unusual had been reported. It did not demonstrate that the reported effect was genuine psychic perception.
Where critics believed the case weakened
The strongest challenges focused less on fraud allegations and more on experimental design.
Psychologists David Marks and Richard Kammann argued that information contained in experiment transcripts could have provided clues that allowed successful target matching without invoking paranormal abilities. In a 1978 Nature critique, they reported that their own attempts to reproduce the findings did not support the original conclusions. [Nature]nature.comRebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments. H. PUTHOFF; R. TARG. Nature (1981). You have full access to this article…Read more…
Their criticism centred on what scientists call “sensory cueing” or information leakage. The concern was that subtle details embedded in records, notes or descriptions might unintentionally reveal the correct target. If such cues existed, apparent remote-viewing successes could be explained without requiring any paranormal process. [Nature]nature.comBrowse Articles Browse the archive of articles on NatureBrowse Articles Browse the archive of articles on Nature
The dispute did not end quickly. In 1981, Puthoff and Targ published a rebuttal in Nature, defending their procedures and responding to criticisms. The fact that the debate continued inside the same journal shows that publication had not settled the issue. Instead, it created an ongoing scientific controversy. [PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govNature. 1974 Oct 18;251(5476):602-7. doi: 10.1038/251602a0. Authors. R Targ, H Puthoff. PMID…Read more…
For sceptics, the subsequent criticism is at least as important as the original publication. Their argument is that the paper gained prestige from appearing in Nature, but the underlying evidence never achieved the level of replication and methodological robustness needed to convince mainstream science.
What the paper means for judging Puthoff today
The 1974 publication can be interpreted in two very different ways, depending on what question is being asked.
If the question is whether Puthoff was a serious researcher with genuine institutional backing, the paper supports that view. The work was conducted at SRI, discussed by intelligence agencies, published in a leading journal and debated by professional scientists. Those are verifiable facts rather than later myths. [Nature]nature.comRUSSELL TARG &; HAROLD PUTHOFF. Nature volume 251, pages 602–607 (…Read more… [CIA]cia.govINFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF…INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SENSORY SHIELDING. Document Type… Targ Ha…
If the question is whether the paper proved remote viewing, the answer is much less favourable. The paper reported suggestive findings, not conclusive proof. Subsequent critiques argued that methodological weaknesses could explain the results, and the broader scientific community never accepted remote viewing as an established phenomenon. [Nature]nature.comnature18 Oct 1974 — WE publish this week a paper by Drs R. Targ and H. Puthoff (page 602) which is bound to create something of.Read more… [Nature]nature.comNatureNatureFirst published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-re…
That tension is central to understanding Puthoff’s credibility profile. The Nature paper gave him a documented record of participating in research that influential institutions considered worth examining. At the same time, the controversy surrounding that research established a pattern that critics still point to today: involvement in claims that attract official interest and occasional positive findings, but that remain scientifically disputed decades later. Nature [PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govNature. 1974 Oct 18;251(5476):602-7. doi: 10.1038/251602a0. Authors. R Targ, H Puthoff. PMID…Read more…
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did the Nature paper prove anything?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Mind-Reach
Provides context for the experiments that brought remote viewing into mainstream attention.
Phenomena
Examines how publication and publicity affected perceptions of psychic research.
The Men Who Stare At Goats
Rating: 3.5/5 from 11 Google Books ratings
Explores military interest in paranormal and remote-viewing programs.
The Demon-Haunted World
Addresses how extraordinary claims should be evaluated after publication.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/251602a0Source snippet
RUSSELL TARG &; HAROLD PUTHOFF. Nature volume 251, pages 602–607 (...Read more...
-
Source: irenaroglic.si
Link: https://irenaroglic.si/wp-content/uploads/slo/znanclanki/nature1974.docSource snippet
information transmission under conditions of sensory shieldingby HE Puthoff · 1974 · Cited by 359 — Uri Geller in which we examined his a...
-
Source: time.com
Title: science new flap over uri
Link: https://time.com/archive/6878192/science-new-flap-over-uri/Source snippet
Science: New Flap Over Uri03 Nov 1974 — The Nature article emphasized experiments at the Stanford Research Institute involving the contro...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/251559a0.pdfSource snippet
nature18 Oct 1974 — WE publish this week a paper by Drs R. Targ and H. Puthoff (page 602) which is bound to create something of.Read more...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/Source snippet
NatureNatureFirst published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-re...
-
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79-00999A000200010002-3.pdfSource snippet
CIACIA-RDP79-00999A000200010002-3In certain situations significant information transmission can take place under shielded conditions. Fac...
-
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00787r000100220001-8Source snippet
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF...INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SENSORY SHIELDING by Dr. Harold E. Puthoff a...
-
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79-00999a000200010008-7Source snippet
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF...INFORMATION TRANSMISSION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SENSORY SHIELDING. Document Type... Targ Ha...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/274680a0Source snippet
NatureInformation transmission in remote viewing experimentsby D MARKS · 1978 · Cited by 50 — TARG AND PUTHOFF 1–3 have described investi...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/319444a0Source snippet
Remote viewing exposedby D MARKS · 1986 · Cited by 18 — Targ, R. & Puthoff, H. Nature 251, 602–607 (1974). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/292388a0Source snippet
Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experimentsby H PUTHOFF · 1981 · Cited by 16 — Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experime...
-
Source: remote.com
Link: https://remote.com/en-gb/Source snippet
Remote — Global Employment Infrastructure | EOR, Payroll...Need to hire anyone, anywhere? We handle the employment contract, taxes, bene...
-
Source: nature.org
Link: https://www.nature.org/en-us/Source snippet
ervation in more than 80 countries and territories.Read more...
-
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/284191a0Source snippet
Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments. H. PUTHOFF; R. TARG. Nature (1981). You have full access to this article...Read more...
-
Source: nature.com
Title: Browse Articles Browse the archive of articles on Nature
Link: https://www.nature.com/nature/articles -
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4423858/Source snippet
Nature. 1974 Oct 18;251(5476):602-7. doi: 10.1038/251602a0. Authors. R Targ, H Puthoff. PMID...Read more...
-
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7254336/Source snippet
PubMedRebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experimentsRebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5...
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Remote viewing
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewingSource snippet
Remote viewingThe alleged paranormal ability to perceive a remote or hidden subject without support of the senses. Year proposed, 1970...
-
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7360248/ -
Source: Wikipedia
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NatureSource snippet
NatureNature is an inherent character or constitution, [1] particularly of the ecosphere or the universe as a whole.Read more...
-
Source: library.harvard.edu
Link: https://library.harvard.edu/services-tools/natureSource snippet
provides access to many types of science research and news. It includes access to: Nature, the international science research journal.Rea...
-
Source: link.springer.com
Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01961270Source snippet
viewing | Cellular and Molecular Life Sciencesby C Scott · 1988 · Cited by 3 — Puthoff, H., and Targ, R., Rebuttal of criticisms of remot...
-
Source: jspr.spr.ac.uk
Link: https://jspr.spr.ac.uk/index.php/jspr/article/view/38/54Source snippet
"Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. Nature, 251(5476), 602–607. [https://doi.org/10.1038/251602a..."](https://doi.org/10.1038/251602a...")...
-
More Inform
-
Source: merriam-webster.com
Title: NATUR E Definition & Meaning6 days ago — 1
Link: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/natureSource snippet
The external world in its entirety. 2. Natural scenery. Enjoyed the beauties of nature. 3. a: disposition, temperament. It was his natur...
-
Source: phys.org
Link: https://phys.org/journals/nature/Source snippet
, first published on 4 November 1869, is ranked the world s most cited interdisciplinary scientific journal by the Science Edition of the...
Published: November 1869
Additional References
-
Source: newdualism.org
Link: https://www.newdualism.org/papers/H.Puthoff/CIA-Initiated%20Remote%20Viewing%20At%20Stanford%20Research%20Institute.htmSource snippet
CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing At Stanford Research Institute[6] R. Targ and H. E. Puthoff, "Information Transfer under Conditions of Senso...
-
Source: theosophical.org
Link: https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/questioning-reality-a-physicists-view-of-psychic-abilitiesSource snippet
E. Puthoff. "Information Transmission under Conditions of Sensory Shielding." Nature, 252 (Oct. 1974), 602-607. Zeilinger, Anton.Read more...
-
Source: open.library.ubc.ca
Link: https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/24/1.0368989/4Source snippet
geller and the reception of parapsychology in the 1970sby JO Green · 2018 · Cited by 2 — In 1973, an article entitled "Information Transm...
-
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harold-Puthoff/publication/15945437_Rebuttal_of_criticisms_of_remote_viewing_experiments/links/57800d8b08ae01f736e49f90/Rebuttal-of-criticisms-of-remote-viewing-experiments.pdfSource snippet
Kammann offer criticism of the SRI experiments in 'remote viewing', the abil- ity of certain individuals to access...Read more...
-
Source: chriscarosa.com
Title: the stargate folly its never about the science its always about the funding
Link: https://chriscarosa.com/2022/04/the-stargate-folly-its-never-about-the-science-its-always-about-the-funding/Source snippet
The Stargate Folly – It's Never About The Science...26 Apr 2022 — The fruits of that study would be published in a paper titled “Informa...
-
Source: researchgate.net
Title: 15945437 Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experiments
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15945437_Rebuttal_of_criticisms_of_remote_viewing_experimentsSource snippet
(PDF) Rebuttal of criticisms of remote viewing experimentsPDF | On Aug 1, 1981, H Puthoff and others published Rebuttal of criticisms of...
-
Source: academia.edu
Link: https://www.academia.edu/74804595/Information_transmission_under_conditions_of_sensory_shieldingSource snippet
sion accuracy by up to 40%, highlighting the role of sensory input in cognitive...Read more...
-
Source: semanticscholar.org
Link: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Information-transmission-under-conditions-of-Targ-Puthoff/c1a4db03518167f6b5df3ecea132f6cd7cb0db2eSource snippet
off · Published in Nature 18 October 1974 · Psychology.Read more...
Published: October 1974
-
Source: andresdelgadoron.substack.com
Title: when psychic spies underwent scientific
Link: https://andresdelgadoron.substack.com/p/when-psychic-spies-underwent-scientificSource snippet
Psychic Spies Underwent Scientific TestingAppraising "Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding," published in Natur...
-
Source: scribd.com
Link: https://www.scribd.com/document/900977492/Information-Transmission-Under-Conditions-of-SensoSource snippet
It has been cited 167 times...Read more...
Topic Tree