How Credible Is Eric Davis?

Eric W. Davis is not a classic UFO witness who says he personally saw a craft. His importance is different: he is a physicist and defence-linked consultant whose name sits at the junction of exotic propulsion research, the Pentagon-linked AAWSAP/AATIP story, alleged crash-retrieval claims, and the disputed “Wilson-Davis memo”.

Preview for How Credible Is Eric Davis?

Introduction

A fair credibility assessment therefore lands in a middle position. Davis is more institutionally connected than many UFO personalities, and some of his professional background is documentable. But institutional proximity is not the same as proof of non-human craft, secret reverse-engineering programmes, or recovered “off-world” vehicles. His value to the UAP debate is as a technically literate insider-adjacent source whose claims deserve careful handling, not as a source whose statements can be treated as established fact.

Overview image for How Credible Is Eric Davis?

Who Eric Davis is, and what can be verified

Eric W. Davis is usually described as a physicist working on advanced aerospace, propulsion, relativity and speculative spaceflight concepts. EarthTech International lists him as a Senior Science Advisor and says his research interests include breakthrough propulsion physics, interstellar flight, directed energy, general relativity, quantum field theory, quantum gravity and SETI/xenoarchaeology. That biography places him in the small world of researchers who examine possibilities at the edge of accepted physics, including ideas that are mathematically discussable but technologically remote. [EarthTech]earthtech.orgEarth Tech Principal TeamEarth Tech Principal Team

His publication record is not imaginary. EarthTech’s own publications page lists books, chapters and technical papers under his name, including the edited volume Frontiers of Propulsion Science. A DIA-hosted Defense Intelligence Reference Document, Traversable Wormholes, Stargates, and Negative Energy, identifies Davis as the author and EarthTech International as the author organisation. The document is marked as part of a series of advanced technology reports under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications programme. [EarthTech]earthtech.orgEarth Tech Principal TeamEarth Tech Principal Team [Defense Intelligence Agency]dia.milFile IdFile Id

That matters because it separates Davis from people whose claimed government access is entirely anecdotal. The paper trail shows that his work intersected with official or quasi-official advanced aerospace studies. It does not, by itself, show that he had first-hand access to alien technology, crash debris, hidden biological evidence, or a compartmented reverse-engineering programme. The distinction is central to his credibility: his technical and contractor background is much easier to substantiate than his most dramatic UAP-related assertions.

What Davis has actually claimed or amplified

The claims most closely associated with Davis fall into three different categories, and they should not be blurred together.

First, he has authored or participated in speculative advanced-propulsion work. This includes official or officially released studies on concepts such as traversable wormholes, warp drives, negative energy and teleportation-related physics. These are not, on their own, UFO claims. They are theoretical or horizon-scanning research topics, some of which were funded or collected under defence-intelligence programmes concerned with future aerospace threats and capabilities. [defense]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024 Intelligence Agency [EarthTech Second]earthtech.orgEarth Tech Principal TeamEarth Tech Principal Team, Davis has been linked to the AAWSAP/AATIP ecosystem. The Black Vault’s archive of released AAWSAP/AATIP-related documents notes that most of the DIA’s Defense Intelligence Reference Documents have been released through FOIA, and that Davis authored some of the better-known speculative papers. A DIA FOIA response to John Greenewald located 37 responsive documents from the relevant document set, though portions were withheld under exemptions. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research [The Black]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research

Third, Davis is associated with stronger UAP claims about recovered objects and inaccessible black programmes. The most famous example is the “Wilson-Davis memo”, a leaked document that purports to record a 2002 conversation between Davis and Admiral Thomas Wilson, a former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The document appears to describe Wilson being denied access to a deeply hidden programme allegedly connected to reverse-engineering recovered craft. But the memo’s authenticity, completeness, interpretation and factual accuracy remain disputed; it is not an official finding. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgSource details in endnotes. [2Enigma Labs | Report a UFO sighting]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes.

The other headline claim came through reporting that Davis had briefed officials about “off-world vehicles not made on this earth”. Subsequent coverage made clear that this was presented as Davis’s claim or conclusion, not as a public Pentagon confirmation. New York magazine’s summary of the 2020 reporting stressed that Davis was among a small group of former officials and scientists saying they were convinced by such claims “without presenting physical proof”. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From [GV Wire]gvwire.comSource details in endnotes.

How Credible Is Eric Davis? illustration 1

The AAWSAP/AATIP connection: real paperwork, contested meaning

Davis’s most credible institutional connection is to the AAWSAP/AATIP world. AAWSAP, usually rendered as the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program, was a Defense Intelligence Agency programme linked to the broader public story of AATIP, the Pentagon-linked UFO/UAP effort first widely reported in 2017. The exact relationship between AAWSAP and AATIP has itself been contested, with different participants and document researchers using the terms differently. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research

The strongest documentation here is not a dramatic witness statement but a dull paper trail: solicitations, FOIA releases, contract-linked materials and Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. Davis’s authorship of speculative DIA papers makes him part of that landscape. It also helps explain why supporters see him as more credible than a normal UFO commentator. He was not merely watching from outside; he contributed technical work to a real defence-intelligence-adjacent research stream. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research [The Black]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research

Sceptics respond that the same paper trail cuts the other way. The existence of government-funded speculative studies does not prove that the government possessed exotic craft. A document about wormholes shows interest in far-future theoretical possibilities, not access to an operational stargate. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation, for example, treated the DIA-funded studies as evidence of questionable spending on highly speculative topics, not evidence that the extraordinary subject matter had been validated. [National Taxpayers Union]ntu.orgtaxpayers paid for research into stargates warp drive in secret defense programtaxpayers paid for research into stargates warp drive in secret defense program

The best reading is that Davis’s AAWSAP/AATIP connection is real but often over-interpreted. It supports the claim that he had proximity to official advanced aerospace and UAP-related inquiry. It does not independently verify the more explosive claims that later became attached to the same network.

The Wilson-Davis memo: why it matters and why it remains unresolved

The Wilson-Davis memo is central to Davis’s UFO reputation because it offers a tidy narrative that many UAP believers find compelling: a senior defence official allegedly discovers a hidden crash-retrieval programme but is blocked from access by a private contractor or special-access gatekeepers. In the leaked document, Davis is not merely a commentator; he is the note-taker and interlocutor. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgSource details in endnotes.

Its importance is also why caution is necessary. The document surfaced publicly years after the alleged 2002 meeting. It is not a declassified government report, not a signed sworn statement by Wilson, and not accompanied by physical evidence of recovered craft. Enigma Labs summarises it as a document that “appeared to be” notes from a meeting, language that reflects the uncertainty around provenance. Sceptical discussion has focused on whether the alleged meeting happened as described, whether the notes accurately reflect what Wilson said, and whether the memo’s contents could reflect rumour, misunderstanding or embellishment rather than a verified programme. [Enigma Labs]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes. Report a UFO sighting

Supporters argue that the memo’s level of detail, Davis’s technical and institutional background, and later echoes in UAP whistleblower claims make it hard to dismiss. They see it as a rare glimpse into how deeply compartmented aerospace secrecy might operate. More cautious readers should separate three questions: whether Davis wrote the notes; whether a conversation with Wilson occurred; and whether the alleged claims inside the conversation are true. The first two, even if accepted, would not automatically prove the third.

For credibility, the memo is a double-edged document. It makes Davis highly relevant because he is attached to one of the most discussed crash-retrieval allegations in modern UAP culture. But it also leaves him exposed to the central evidential problem of the whole subject: a dramatic claim without public physical evidence, official confirmation or a clean independent chain of custody.

How Credible Is Eric Davis? illustration 2

“Off-world vehicles”: the strongest claim with the weakest public proof

The phrase most likely to follow Davis around is “off-world vehicles not made on this earth”. In 2020, press coverage reported that Davis had briefed US defence officials and congressional staff on retrievals of unexplained objects and had used language implying that at least some material could not be made by humans. That wording was widely amplified because it sounded like a near-official acknowledgement of alien technology. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From [New York]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From

The careful reading is less dramatic. The public record shows that Davis reportedly made or relayed such claims; it does not show that the Department of Defense publicly endorsed them. New York magazine’s account emphasised that the group of officials and scientists involved had not presented physical proof. The Independent and other outlets similarly framed the matter as ex-advisers or former insiders suggesting that such materials existed, not as the Pentagon producing public evidence. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From

Later reporting weakened the evidential status of at least some material-related claims. The Wall Street Journal reported that a sample linked to UFO speculation and tested through an Army-connected pathway was ultimately assessed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory as terrestrial in origin, likely from a Second World War-era artefact. The same article placed Davis and Hal Puthoff within a broader ecosystem of Pentagon-linked exotic-material and UAP claims, while noting that official investigation failed to produce tangible proof of alien technology. [The Wall Street Journal]wsj.comKirkpatrick's investigation unearthed a mix of fringe science, conspiracy theories, and shadowy government projects involving figures lik…

That does not prove Davis was dishonest. It does show the danger of turning “we cannot presently identify this” into “this is not from Earth”. In credibility terms, the “off-world vehicles” claim is high-impact but low-transparency. It relies heavily on Davis’s asserted access and judgement, while the public evidence available so far remains insufficient to validate the conclusion.

What AARO changed about the credibility picture

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, is now the US government body charged with reviewing UAP records and claims. Its 2024 historical report is important because it directly addresses the broader claim-world in which Davis’s statements circulate: hidden reverse-engineering programmes, off-world craft, classified UAP compartments and recurring allegations that Congress has been kept in the dark. [AARO]aaro.milAARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024

AARO said it reviewed official US government investigatory efforts since 1945, researched classified and unclassified archives, conducted about 30 interviews, and worked with intelligence-community and defence officials responsible for controlled and special-access programme oversight. The report explicitly says its goal was to investigate past US government UAP efforts and claims that the government or contractors had recovered and hidden off-world technology and biological material. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

Its conclusion was sceptical: AARO reported that it found no empirical evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review panel had confirmed a UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology. Reuters summarised the report as finding no evidence of extraterrestrial technology and judging that many cases would probably resolve as ordinary objects or phenomena with better data. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

For Davis, AARO does not settle every question. A believer can argue that AARO lacked access, that witnesses withheld details, or that public reports omit classified findings. But those are arguments about possible missing evidence, not evidence itself. As a public credibility marker, AARO’s findings narrow the space in which Davis’s strongest claims can be treated as proven. They remain allegations or insider claims unless better corroboration appears.

How Credible Is Eric Davis? illustration 3

Supporters’ best case for taking Davis seriously

The best argument for Davis is not that every extraordinary statement associated with him is true. It is that he is a technically trained person with a documented history in precisely the government-adjacent circles where such information, if it existed, might plausibly circulate. His work with EarthTech, his DIA-linked technical papers, his place in the AAWSAP/AATIP ecosystem and his later association with UAP disclosure figures make him harder to dismiss than a purely online rumour source. Disclosure Foundation 3EarthTech [Defense Intelligence Agency]dia.milFile IdFile Id

Supporters also point to the consistency of themes across several modern UAP figures: crash retrievals, private aerospace contractors, special-access programmes, congressional exclusion and classified briefings. They see Davis as one node in a wider pattern rather than a lone claimant. The 2024 congressional testimony of Michael Shellenberger, for example, reflects the pro-disclosure argument that AARO has dismissed claims too quickly and that officials with high clearances have come forward with serious allegations. [House Document Repository]docs.house.govHHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113

This case is strongest when framed modestly: Davis is a serious person worth interviewing under oath or in classified oversight settings; his claims should be checked against records, contracts, programme-access logs and witness testimony; and public dismissal should not rest on ridicule. That is different from saying his claims are already proved.

Sceptics’ best case for caution

The sceptical case is not simply that UFOs are silly. It is that Davis’s most important UAP claims suffer from familiar evidential weaknesses: hearsay, leaked documents, classified-source appeals, ambiguous material samples, and a lack of public chain of custody. Those weaknesses remain even when the person making the claim has real credentials. [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From Metabunk Sceptics also note that speculative defence research can be mistaken for validation. A government-funded paper on warp drives or wormholes pr [metabunk.org]metabunk.orgthe congressional uap hearings debrief.13077the congressional uap hearings debrief.13077 oves that someone was paid to study a concept; it does not prove that the concept is operational, that UAP use it, or that recovered craft exist. Davis’s own technical topics can look exotic enough to encourage over-reading by audiences already primed for hidden-technology narratives. [defense]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024 Intelligence Agency [2Public Intelligence |]info.publicintelligence.netSource details in endnotes.

A further caution is network effects. The modern UAP disclosure world contains a relatively small set of recurring names, institutions and claims. AARO’s report specifically warned about circular reporting in which people who share similar beliefs repeat claims that appear independent but trace back to a limited network. That criticism, whether fully accepted or not, is directly relevant to Davis because his claims are often cited within that same ecosystem. [House Document Repository]docs.house.govHHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113

The sceptical position is strongest when it avoids dismissing Davis’s real background and focuses instead on proof standards. A credible person can report an unverified claim. A classified briefing can contain an allegation rather than a confirmed fact. A leaked memo can be interesting without being decisive.

Credibility assessment: useful source, insufficient proof

Eric Davis should be treated as a significant UAP figure, but not as a conclusive one. His verified strengths are clear: relevant scientific training, documented technical publications, real involvement in exotic aerospace research, and connections to government-linked UAP/advanced-technology programmes. Those facts make him worth including in any serious account of modern UAP discourse. [The Black Vault]theblackvault.comthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report researchthe advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research [3EarthTech 3EarthTech]earthtech.orgEarth Tech Principal TeamEarth Tech Principal Team

His weaknesses are equally clear. The claims that make him famous in UFO circles are not the same as the claims that are publicly documented. The public can verify that he wrote speculative papers and operated in relevant contractor networks. The public cannot verify, from currently available evidence, that the United States possesses non-human craft, that the Wilson-Davis memo accurately records a true crash-retrieval access dispute, or that “off-world vehicles” have been physically confirmed. [Enigma Labs]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes. Report a UFO sighting [New York Magazine]nymag.comNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not FromNew York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has 'Off-World Vehicles' Not From

The fairest summary is this: Davis is credible on his own professional proximity to advanced aerospace and UAP-adjacent government work; plausible but not independently confirmed on some descriptions of classified briefings and insider conversations; and unproven on the strongest claims about recovered non-human technology. His role has unquestionably influenced modern UAP discourse by giving technically literate and institutionally connected form to claims that once lived mostly in UFO subculture. Whether that influence ultimately points towards hidden reality, sincere misinterpretation, or circular amplification remains unresolved.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Credible Is Eric Davis?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: earthtech.org
    Title: Earth Tech Principal Team
    Link: https://earthtech.org/team/

  2. Source: dia.mil
    Title: File Id
    Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170048/

  3. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf

  4. Source: earthtech.org
    Link: https://earthtech.org/pubs/davis/

  5. Source: earthtech.org
    Title: teleportation via Wormhole Stargates Eric Davis
    Link: https://www.earthtech.org/publications/teleportation_via_Wormhole-Stargates_Eric_Davis.pdf

  6. Source: documentcloud.org
    Link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6185702-Eric-Davis-meeting-with-Adm-Wilson/

  7. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/library/b80b4058-3f47-4b2a-8d61-b735c4c4bf69

  8. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: the congressional uap hearings debrief.13077
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-congressional-uap-hearings-debrief.13077/

  9. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

  10. Source: reuters.com
    Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/

  11. Source: disclosure.org
    Title: eric davis
    Link: https://disclosure.org/team/eric-davis

  12. Source: docs.house.gov
    Title: HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113
    Link: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-ShellenbergerM-20241113.pdf

  13. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

  14. Source: archive.org
    Link: https://archive.org/stream/traversable-wormholes-stargates-negative-energy-001-2/traversable-wormholes–stargates—-negative-energy001%20%282%29_djvu.txt

  15. Source: oversight.house.gov
    Title: Written Testimony Shellenberger
    Link: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Shellenberger.pdf

  16. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: Kona Blue
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/kona-blue-aaro-report-on-the-proposed-aawsap-successor.13434/page-2

  17. Source: metabunk.org
    Title: AAR O’s Historical UAP Report
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/aaros-historical-uap-report-volume-1.13375/

  18. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/

  19. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: UAP Records
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/

  20. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Physicist Dr. Eric Davis UFO Interview Reviewed by Hannibal
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qOE3ge0jfM
    Source snippet

    Eric Davis - Hyperspace for Space Travel...

  21. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Eric Davis
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czNwSROec3Y
    Source snippet

    Eric Weinstein Demands UFO Secrets From Pentagon Scientist...

  22. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: the advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-advanced-aviation-threat-identification-program-aatip-dird-report-research/

  23. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Title: FOIA 00159 2018
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/FOIA%2000159-2018.pdf

  24. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: the advanced aerospace weapon system applications program aawsap documentation
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-advanced-aerospace-weapon-system-applications-program-aawsap-documentation/

  25. Source: nymag.com
    Title: New York Magazine UFO Report: Pentagon Has ‘Off-World Vehicles’ Not From
    Link: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/ufo-report-pentagon-has-off-world-vehicles-not-from-earth.html

  26. Source: gvwire.com
    Link: https://gvwire.com/2020/07/23/not-made-of-this-earth-pentagons-u-f-o-unit-directed-to-make-some-findings-public/

  27. Source: theblackvault.com
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/to-the-stars-academy-of-arts-science-tom-delonge-and-the-secret-dod-ufo-research-program/

  28. Source: ntu.org
    Title: taxpayers paid for research into stargates [warp drive]({{ ‘warp-drive-bc4c41/’ | relative_url }}) in secret defense program
    Link: https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/taxpayers-paid-for-research-into-stargates-warp-drive-in-secret-defense-program

  29. Source: nypost.com
    Title: pentagon ufo unit to publicly release some findings
    Link: https://nypost.com/2020/07/23/pentagon-ufo-unit-to-publicly-release-some-findings/

  30. Source: wsj.com
    Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-ufo-investigation-lockheed-martin-1bac3d41
    Source snippet

    Kirkpatrick's investigation unearthed a mix of fringe science, conspiracy theories, and shadowy government projects involving figures lik...

  31. Source: info.publicintelligence.net
    Link: https://info.publicintelligence.net/DIA-WarpDrives.pdf

  32. Source: documents3.theblackvault.com
    Title: Records pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
    Link: https://documents3.theblackvault.com/documents/cbp/Records%20pertaining%20to%20Unidentified%20Aerial%20Phenomenon.pdf

  33. Source: documents.theblackvault.com
    Title: Open Letter To TTSA
    Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/OpenLetterToTTSA.pdf

  34. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/20-F-1095.pdf

  35. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Title: DIA FOIA Request Log 2018
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/foia/DIA-FOIA_Request_Log_2018.pdf

  36. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/20-F-0163.pdf

  37. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Title: Nov132024Hearing Shellenberger
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/congress/Nov132024Hearing-Shellenberger.pdf

  38. Source: inspirehep.net
    Title: Eric W. Davis
    Link: https://inspirehep.net/authors/1045791

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Eric Weinstein Demands UFO Secrets From Pentagon Scientist
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnxasfyHtfo
    Source snippet

    Dr. Eric Davis On Teleportation & Science Secrecy...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Eric Davis: “A US President Was Briefed on UFOs!”
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnAiNChnuEQ
    Source snippet

    Physicist Dr. Eric Davis UFO Interview Reviewed by Hannibal...

  3. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253979249_Interstellar_Travel_by_Means_of_Wormhole_Induction_Propulsion_WHIP

  4. Source: academia.edu
    Link: https://www.academia.edu/44615051/The_Pentagons_UAP_Task_Force

  5. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/AncientHistory68/posts/a-consultant-for-the-pentagon-ufo-program-is-speaking-out-about-retrievals-from-/137115689056543/

  6. Source: hangar1publishing.com
    Link: https://hangar1publishing.com/blogs/ufos-uaps-and-aliens/alien-government-cover-ups?srsltid=AfmBOooUzHWeIx-wtbEg6J2Pvyvx9y930K4F3CZHVCLsCGw8_4XLaiRk

  7. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/goodmoviesnews.nt/posts/1439478724044844/

  8. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/198t9os/confirmation_of_the_wilsondavis_memo_i_already/

  9. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1gceoz4/context_on_wilsondavis_memo/

  10. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2831584017041492/posts/2833072003559360/

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Related pages 11

More on this topic 8