Why the 2023 Hearing Changed the Story

Introduction

The 2023 House Oversight hearing changed David Grusch’s public credibility by moving him from an interview-based UFO whistleblower story into a sworn congressional witness in a nationally visible setting. That mattered because Congress confirmed his relevance as a witness, placed his claims beside testimony from respected military aviators, and framed UAP secrecy as an oversight issue rather than just a fringe belief. But the hearing did not prove his most dramatic allegations. It strengthened the public case that Grusch was a serious insider making formal claims through official channels; it did not independently establish that the US government possesses non-human craft, biologics, or a hidden reverse-engineering programme. The result was a split credibility effect: politically amplified, procedurally more serious, but still evidentially unresolved. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans… Oversight Committee [House Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govHouse Oversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency…

Why the hearing changed the story

Before the July 2023 hearing, Grusch’s allegations had already attracted attention because they were reported as coming from a former intelligence official who had taken claims to Congress and the Intelligence Community Inspector General. The original public story was extraordinary: that the US had recovered intact or partially intact craft of “non-human” origin and that this had been hidden from ordinary oversight. But it still arrived through journalism, unnamed sources, classified-process references and Grusch’s own account rather than public documents or physical evidence. [The Debrief]thedebrief.orgThe Debrief Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of NonThe Debrief Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non

The hearing changed the audience and the status of the claim. The House Oversight Committee’s own page listed the event as a formal hearing on “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency”, with Grusch appearing alongside Ryan Graves and retired Commander David Fravor. The committee identified Grusch as a former National Reconnaissance Office representative to the UAP Task Force, which gave the proceeding an institutional frame rather than the feel of a media spectacle alone. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans…

That distinction is central to his credibility. A congressional hearing is not a trial, a scientific validation process, or proof that a witness’s underlying claims are true. It is, however, a public act of political seriousness. By inviting Grusch, placing him under oath, and asking him about where evidence could be found, Congress made it harder to dismiss him merely as an online rumour. At the same time, the hearing exposed the central weakness of his case: the most sensational parts still depended on what he said other people had told him, not on public exhibits that independent observers could inspect. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans… Oversight Committee [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more…

Testimony under oath

Grusch’s opening statement was carefully framed around his background, whistleblower status and the limits of what he said he could discuss publicly. He stated that he had been an intelligence officer for 14 years, had served in the US Air Force and at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and had been involved in UAP and “trans-medium object” analysis. He also said he became a whistleblower after receiving reports from current and former military and intelligence personnel that the US government was operating in secrecy “above Congressional oversight” regarding UAPs. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans…

The strongest credibility gain from the hearing came from that formal posture. Grusch was not speaking anonymously, not appearing only on a podcast, and not merely repeating a rumour in a private setting. He was testifying in a named capacity, before elected officials, in a setting where false statements could carry legal and reputational consequences. For supporters, that made his claims more difficult to brush aside: a former intelligence officer was publicly saying Congress had been denied visibility into programmes he believed existed. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans…

Yet his own wording also kept the evidential question open. In the written statement, Grusch said his testimony was based on information given to him by people with “a longstanding track record of legitimacy and service”, and he added that some had shared alleged photography, documentation and classified oral testimony. He also said, crucially, that he was “speaking to the facts as I have been told them”. That phrase helps explain why the hearing improved his standing as a whistleblower but not as a direct proof source for alien technology. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans…

The most memorable moment was his statement that “non-human biologics” had allegedly been recovered with some craft. Public reporting noted that he said he had not personally seen those biologics and was relying on people he described as having direct knowledge. This was dramatic enough to make the hearing internationally newsworthy, but it also sharpened the credibility problem: the stronger the claim became, the more visible the lack of public corroborating evidence became. [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more… [The Guardian]theguardian.comufo hearing congress david grusch whistleblower live updatesufo hearing congress david grusch whistleblower live updates

How other witnesses shaped the setting

The hearing did not rest on Grusch alone. Ryan Graves and David Fravor gave the session a different kind of credibility because their testimony centred on pilot experiences and aviation safety rather than hidden crash-retrieval programmes. Graves had become associated with concerns about frequent UAP encounters by military aviators, while Fravor was linked to the 2004 “Tic Tac” encounter, one of the most widely discussed modern military UAP cases. The House witness list put these men beside Grusch, which gave the hearing a broader national-security and pilot-reporting context. House Documents [House Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govHouse Oversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency…

This helped Grusch in one way and complicated him in another. It helped because the presence of military pilots made the hearing feel less like a single extraordinary allegation and more like part of a wider institutional problem: service members see things, reporting channels may be inadequate, and stigma may discourage disclosure. That made Grusch’s demand for congressional scrutiny sound less isolated. [Vanity Fair]vanityfair.comSource details in endnotes.

But it also created a useful comparison. Graves and Fravor were primarily associated with direct observation of unusual aerial phenomena. Grusch’s claims were different in kind: alleged secret programmes, recovered materials, biologics, contractor concealment and reprisals. The hearing therefore raised two credibility questions at once. One was whether UAP reporting deserved better official handling; the other was whether Grusch’s specific hidden-programme allegations were true. The first question gained broad legitimacy. The second remained unproven. AP News [House Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govHouse Oversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency…

This distinction matters for readers assessing Grusch. Public sympathy for pilots who report unexplained encounters does not automatically validate claims about non-human crash retrievals. Conversely, scepticism about the crash-retrieval claim does not mean every UAP safety concern is unserious. The hearing’s biggest public effect was to join those two issues in one televised event, even though they require different standards of evidence. [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more…

What the hearing made more credible

The hearing strengthened several limited claims about Grusch and the UAP debate.

First, it made his institutional relevance harder to deny. The committee did not present him as a random claimant. Its witness page described him as a former National Reconnaissance Office representative to the UAP Task Force, and his own statement gave a detailed account of his intelligence and UAP-related work. That does not prove the hidden programmes existed, but it supports the narrower claim that he had a plausible route to hear sensitive UAP-related allegations. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans…

Second, it made the oversight question more credible. Grusch’s strongest public argument was not “believe me because aliens are real”; it was that Congress should investigate whether classified programmes had evaded lawful oversight. That argument fitted neatly into the committee’s transparency and national-security remit, and it also aligned with Senate interest in creating a UAP records process. Schumer and Rounds’ UAP Disclosure Act proposal called for a National Archives collection and a presumption of disclosure for UAP records, while acknowledging that stories circulating around the issue had “varying levels of credibility”. [senate]democrats.senate.govSource details in endnotes.

Third, it gave supporters a procedural milestone. After the hearing, supporters could point to testimony under oath, bipartisan congressional interest and proposed disclosure legislation rather than only to interviews and specialist UFO media. This was the major public-credibility gain: Grusch became part of an official oversight story, not merely a personality within UFO discourse. [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more…

Those gains are real but bounded. They improve the credibility of Grusch as a serious complainant with relevant background. They do not independently verify the alleged existence of non-human craft, biologics or a concealed reverse-engineering programme.

What the hearing did not settle

The hearing did not produce the kind of evidence that would settle Grusch’s central claims for a sceptical public. There were no public photographs authenticated by independent experts, no named first-hand custodians of recovered material, no declassified programme records, no chain of custody for alleged biologics, and no physical sample. The most dramatic statements were presented as information Grusch said he had received from others, with details deferred to classified settings. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans… Oversight Committee [AP News]apnews.comufos uaps congress whistleblower spy aliens ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7ufos uaps congress whistleblower spy aliens ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7

That gap became more important after official pushback. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, later published a historical report stating that it found no evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review had confirmed extraterrestrial technology. AARO also reported no evidence that the US government or private companies had reverse-engineered extraterrestrial material. U.S. Department of War [reuters]reuters.comSource details in endnotes. There was also a process dispute over whether Grusch had provided information to AARO. An AARO memorandum dated January 2024 said the officehad made multiple attempts to invite Grusch for an oral history interview about his claimed knowledge of US possession of extraterrestrial material and reverse-engineering programmes, and that those invitations had negative results. The memo also stated that AARO was authorised to receive UAP-related information regardless of classification or compartmentalisation. [Defense Personal Property System]esd.whs.mil24 F 0250 Final Product24 F 0250 Final Product

For sceptics, this weakened the public force of the hearing. If Grusch had names, locations and programme details, they argued, the relevant investigative bodies needed usable information, not just public hints. For supporters, the same dispute looked different: they argued that classified channels, legal exposure, reprisals and compartmented access could explain why he avoided giving details publicly or insisted on particular secure conditions. The public record does not fully resolve that disagreement. [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more…

The credibility trade-off: oath versus evidence

The hearing created a common misunderstanding: that testimony under oath is the same as proof. It is not. Testimony under oath can raise the cost of lying and clarify what a witness is willing to stand behind. It does not make hearsay into direct evidence, and it does not substitute for records, material samples or independent corroboration.

For Grusch, the oath mattered most on questions about what he said he was told, what complaints he filed, what he believed Congress should investigate, and what he could offer in a classified setting. It mattered less as proof that the underlying claims were true. A person can be honest about receiving reports from other officials while those reports may still be mistaken, exaggerated, misinterpreted, part of internal lore, or based on classified programmes unrelated to non-human technology. [house]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Microsoft WordHouse Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans… Oversight Committee [Boston University]bu.eduex intelligence official us government ufoex intelligence official us government ufo

That is why the hearing produced such different reactions. Believers saw a decorated insider risking his career before Congress. Sceptics saw another high-status witness making extraordinary claims without public evidence. Both reactions draw on something real. Grusch’s credentials and formal testimony increase the seriousness of the allegation; the absence of public proof limits how far credibility can reasonably extend. [The Atlantic]theatlantic.comThe Atlantic Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About AliensThe Atlantic Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About Aliens [Vanity]vanityfair.comSource details in endnotes.

Public credibility after the hearing

The clearest before-and-after change was mainstream visibility. Grusch’s claims moved from a specialist story into coverage by major outlets, wire services and international media. The Associated Press, Time, the Guardian and others reported the hearing because the spectacle of a former intelligence official discussing non-human biologics before Congress was newsworthy, even while the reports also stressed the lack of confirmed evidence. AP News [Time]time.comSource details in endnotes.

That wider coverage made Grusch more credible to some readers simply because the topic was no longer confined to UFO podcasts, documentaries or online forums. Congressional attention can reduce stigma: if elected officials are asking questions, then perhaps the issue is not absurd to discuss. NASA’s later UAP study also reinforced the idea that stigma around reporting unusual observations should be reduced, while still finding no evidence that UAP observations were extraterrestrial. [AP News]apnews.comcongress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3fhas concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or…Read more…

But mainstream attention also made the weaknesses more visible. Once the claim entered national news, journalists and scientists applied ordinary evidential standards: where is the material, who has custody, what documents can be reviewed, and what independent body has verified the claim? Vanity Fair reported that major outlets had earlier hesitated over the original Grusch story partly because of verification concerns and lack of physical evidence. That same issue remained after the hearing. [Vanity Fair]vanityfair.comSource details in endnotes.

The most balanced assessment is that the hearing increased Grusch’s public importance more than it increased the proven truth of his claims. He became a central figure in the politics of UAP transparency. He did not become, on the public evidence available so far, a confirmed witness to recovered non-human technology.

What would change the assessment now

The hearing left a clear standard for future credibility. Grusch’s position would be strengthened if named first-hand witnesses testified publicly or in documented official channels; if Congress or inspectors general confirmed specific concealed programmes; if authenticated records showed illegal withholding from oversight; or if physical material with a credible chain of custody were made available for independent analysis. Procedural seriousness alone cannot carry a claim this large indefinitely. [senate]democrats.senate.govSource details in endnotes. Democratic Leadership [Senate Democratic Leadership]democrats.senate.govSource details in endnotes.

His credibility would weaken if investigations continue to find no verifiable evidence, if alleged sources fail to appear in usable channels, or if the claims remain permanently dependent on unnamed people and inaccessible documents. AARO’s historical report and its memorandum about attempts to interview Grusch are important here because they show that official review has not publicly validated his central allegations and that there was disagreement over whether he engaged with the office set up to investigate UAP claims. [Defense Personal Property System]esd.whs.mil24 F 0250 Final Product24 F 0250 Final Product [2U.S. Department of War]facebook.comU.S. Department of WarU.S. Department of War

The fairest conclusion is not that the hearing proved Grusch right or exposed him as false. It showed why he matters: he had enough background, procedural standing and congressional relevance to force public attention. It also showed why the story remains unresolved: his most consequential claims still sit behind classified-process claims, unnamed sources and missing public evidence. For public credibility, the 2023 hearing was a turning point in seriousness, not a final verdict.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why the 2023 Hearing Changed the Story. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Imminent

By Luis Elizondo

Closely tied to the congressional and Pentagon disclosure era.

See on Amazon

Book

UFO

By Garrett M. Graff

Provides context for why the hearing mattered historically.

See on Amazon

Book

In Plain Sight

By Ross Coulthart

Covers modern whistleblower and UAP narratives.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Focuses on witnesses similar to those highlighted in the hearing.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: Imminent UFO In Plain Sight

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Endnotes

1. Source: oversight.house.gov
   Link: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-implications-on-national-security-public-safety-and-government-transparency/
   Source snippet

   House Oversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency...

2. Source: oversight.house.gov
   Title: Oversight Committee Microsoft Word
   Link: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans.pdf
   Source snippet

   House Oversight CommitteeMicrosoft Word - Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans...

3. Source: docs.house.gov
   Link: https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=116282
   Source snippet

   “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency” | Committee Repository...

4. Source: time.com
   Link: https://time.com/6298287/congress-ufo-hearing/

5. Source: media.defense.gov
   Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
   Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

6. Source: reuters.com
   Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/

7. Source: democrats.senate.gov
   Link: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/schumer-rounds-introduce-new-legislation-to-declassify-government-records-related-to-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-and-ufos_modeled-after-jfk-assassination-records-collection-act–as-an-amendment-to-ndaa

8. Source: democrats.senate.gov
   Title: uap amendment
   Link: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/uap_amendment.pdf

9. Source: oversight.house.gov
   Title: Written Testimony Shellenberger
   Link: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Shellenberger.pdf

10. Source: docs.house.gov
    Title: HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113
    Link: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-ShellenbergerM-20241113.pdf

11. Source: war.gov
    Title: media engagement with acting aaro director tim phillips on the historical recor
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3702219/media-engagement-with-acting-aaro-director-tim-phillips-on-the-historical-recor/

12. Source: apnews.com
    Title: congress ufos uaps pentagon aliens 631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3f
    Link: https://apnews.com/article/congress-ufos-uaps-pentagon-aliens-631ad4d174ee9559580935ec11afcf3f
    Source snippet

    has concealed what he called a “multi-decade” program to collect and reverse-engineer “UAPs,” or...Read more...

13. Source: thedebrief.org
    Title: The Debrief Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non
    Link: https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

14. Source: vanityfair.com
    Link: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/06/ufo-report-media

15. Source: apnews.com
    Title: ufos uaps congress whistleblower spy aliens ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7
    Link: https://apnews.com/article/ufos-uaps-congress-whistleblower-spy-aliens-ba8a8cfba353d7b9de29c3d906a69ba7

16. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: ufo hearing congress david grusch whistleblower live updates
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/jul/26/ufo-hearing-congress-david-grusch-whistleblower-live-updates

17. Source: vanityfair.com
    Link: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/07/ufo-hearing-congress

18. Source: apnews.com
    Link: https://apnews.com/article/8b477a5ed6a42f99bb13a4518368ce9a

19. Source: theguardian.com
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/08/pentagon-ufo-report-hiding-aliens

20. Source: esd.whs.mil
    Title: 24 F 0250 Final Product
    Link: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/UFOsandUAPs/24-F-0250_Final_Product.pdf

21. Source: bu.edu
    Title: ex intelligence official us government ufo
    Link: https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/ex-intelligence-official-us-government-ufo/

22. Source: theatlantic.com
    Title: The Atlantic Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About Aliens
    Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/06/alien-intact-vehicles-ufo-us-government/674323/

23. Source: theguardian.com
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/14/ufo-nasa-research-chief-announcement

24. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: house ufo hearing
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/13/house-ufo-hearing

25. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: whistleblower ufo alien tech spacecraft
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/whistleblower-ufo-alien-tech-spacecraft

26. Source: theguardian.com
    Title: ufo hearing update congress whistleblower
    Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/26/ufo-hearing-update-congress-whistleblower

27. Source: facebook.com
    Title: U.S. Department of War
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/DepartmentofWar/posts/statement-attributable-to-assistant-to-the-secretary-of-war-for-public-affairs-a/1440451988121062/

28. Source: rev.com
    Title: house uap whistleblower hearing
    Link: https://www.rev.com/transcripts/house-uap-whistleblower-hearing

29. Source: rev.com
    Title: [house hearing]({{ ‘house-hearing/’ | relative_url }}) on unidentified anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.rev.com/transcripts/house-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Title: David Fravor Opening Statement at Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Hearing
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usPustgTcDU
   Source snippet

   Live: Congress holds hearing on UFOs after whistleblowers claim government kept information secret...

2. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXri0KF2oZY
   Source snippet

   David Grusch Opening Statement at Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Hearing...

3. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLTbIgZwu5s
   Source snippet

   Whistleblower opening statement in House hearing on alleged covert government UAP program...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: David Grusch Opening Statement at Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Hearing
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcrCMLVk614
   Source snippet

   David Fravor Opening Statement at Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Hearing...

5. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/itvnews/posts/a-nasa-report-into-unidentified-flying-objects-ufos-has-found-no-evidence-that-t/686500760179269/

6. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/FOX56wolftv/posts/a-new-batch-of-declassified-pentagon-ufo-materials-is-fueling-fresh-public-fasci/1702051294719622/

7. Source: reddit.com
   Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/17l1mcv/david_grusch_replies_to_kirkpatricks_claims_i/

8. Source: thenationaldesk.com
   Link: https://thenationaldesk.com/news/fact-check-team/fact-check-team-pentagon-releases-new-ufo-files-but-no-evidence-of-aliens-found-extraterrestrial-military-space-nasa-particles-declassified-mars

9. Source: abcnews4.com
   Link: https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/fact-check-team-pentagon-releases-new-ufo-files-but-no-evidence-of-aliens-found-extraterrestrial-military-space-nasa-particles-declassified-mars

10. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews/posts/former-us-air-force-intelligence-officer-and-whistleblower-david-grusch-says-non/614056397500205/