What Did AAWSAP Actually Prove?

Introduction

Hal Puthoff’s connection to AAWSAP and AATIP gives him a real place in the modern UAP story, but it does not prove the strongest claims often attached to that story. The public record shows that a DIA-managed programme existed, that Bigelow Aerospace was the main contractor, that Puthoff’s EarthTech network contributed speculative technical work, and that people around the programme later helped drive mainstream UAP disclosure. It also shows something narrower and less dramatic: official reviews have not found that AAWSAP or AATIP established extraterrestrial technology, crash retrievals, non-human bodies, or a hidden reverse-engineering programme. AARO’s 2024 historical review says the programme produced exploratory papers, reviewed cases, strayed into paranormal work, and was terminated in 2012 after DIA and DoD concerns. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”) [2U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

For Puthoff’s credibility, the key issue is not whether AAWSAP/AATIP was imaginary. It was not. The issue is what can fairly be inferred from his proximity to it. His involvement supports the claim that he operated inside a government-funded frontier-science and UAP-adjacent network. It does not, on the available public evidence, turn his wider claims about exotic technology or non-human intelligence into established fact.

The official programme record narrows the story

The official record describes AAWSAP as a real Defense Intelligence Agency effort funded through congressional appropriations. AARO says that, at Harry Reid’s direction, the FY 2008 and FY 2010 defence appropriations provided $22 million for DIA to assess long-term and over-the-horizon foreign advanced aerospace threats. DIA established AAWSAP in 2009, “also known” as AATIP in some documentation, and awarded the contract to a private-sector organisation, widely understood from other reporting and FOIA releases to be Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That matters because it gives Puthoff’s orbit a genuine institutional setting. This was not simply a private UFO club describing itself as official. The DIA did fund work under an advanced aerospace threat framing. The programme produced a set of Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, including highly theoretical subjects such as warp drive, wormholes, vacuum engineering, invisibility cloaking and advanced propulsion. The Federation of American Scientists noted that DIA released a list of 38 research titles in 2019, many of which it characterised as conjectural and beyond ordinary science, engineering or military intelligence. [Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOsFederation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs

Puthoff’s most direct documented link is through this technical-report ecosystem. One AAWSAP/DIA report, “Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering”, is attributed to H. E. Puthoff of EarthTech International in publicly circulated copies, and the same title appears in the DIA/FOIA inventory of released DIRDs. [Public Intelligence |]info.publicintelligence.netDIA Advanced Space PropulsionDIA Advanced Space Propulsion EarthTech’s own site says the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin was founded by Puthoff in 1985 and later incorporated under EarthTech International in 1991; its team page identifies him as EarthTech’s president, chief executive and chairman, as well as director of the Institute. [EarthTech]earthtech.orgEarth Tech AboutEarth Tech About

The credibility gain is therefore specific. Puthoff can reasonably be described as a figure whose technical ideas and institutional network intersected with a real DIA-funded programme. The credibility limit is equally specific. The official record does not show that Puthoff managed AAWSAP, had custody of recovered craft, or had public, independently testable proof of non-human technology through the programme.

The AATIP naming confusion is central, not cosmetic

A great deal of public confusion comes from the shifting use of “AAWSAP” and “AATIP”. In popular accounts, AATIP is often presented as the Pentagon’s UFO programme, sometimes with the implication that it continued as a distinct official office after the funded DIA contract ended. AARO’s version is more restrictive. It says the names AAWSAP and AATIP were used interchangeably on some official documentation, but also says AATIP was never an official DoD programme in the way the public often imagines. After AAWSAP was cancelled, AARO says the AATIP label was used by some people in an informal, unofficial UAP community of interest inside DoD, with no dedicated personnel or budget. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

This distinction directly affects Puthoff’s credibility. If “AATIP” is treated as a formal, continuous, well-resourced Pentagon office, then association with AATIP sounds like association with a major classified discovery pipeline. If, instead, the formal funded programme was AAWSAP, and later “AATIP” partly became a loose label for informal UAP interest, then the evidential weight changes. It still shows access and influence, but not necessarily the existence of a robust official finding that extraordinary claims were true.

This is why AAWSAP/AATIP can simultaneously strengthen and weaken Puthoff’s public standing. It strengthens it because it confirms he was not operating wholly outside government-adjacent research. It weakens some broader promotional uses of his role because the programme’s official descriptions are narrower than many media retellings. The more precise the wording becomes, the less AAWSAP/AATIP can be used as a blanket credential for every exotic claim attached to the modern disclosure movement.

What AAWSAP actually funded

AAWSAP’s public-facing title suggested advanced aerospace threat analysis, and that is part of what the paper trail shows. The released DIRD inventory includes topics that are recognisably aerospace or defence-adjacent: advanced materials, microwave technology, propulsion, fusion, space access, quantum communication and high-energy lasers. A 2022 DIA FOIA response to John Greenewald located 37 responsive DIRD documents totalling 1,473 pages, with portions withheld under FOIA exemptions. [The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault

But the programme was not just a tidy technical forecasting exercise. AARO says the contractor conducted UFO research with the support of the DIA programme manager, including reviews of new cases, older Project Blue Book cases, observer debriefings, investigatory teams and proposals for laboratories to examine recovered UFO materials. AARO also says AAWSAP/AATIP investigated alleged UAP and paranormal activity at a Utah property owned by the head of the private-sector organisation, including “shadow figures”, “creatures”, remote viewing and human-consciousness anomalies. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That mixture is crucial for assessing Puthoff. His career had already moved through remote viewing, quantum-vacuum and advanced propulsion speculation, and AAWSAP’s mixture of aerospace, UAP and paranormal-adjacent work overlaps closely with that intellectual territory. For supporters, this suggests Puthoff was exactly the kind of unconventional scientist willing to explore areas that mainstream institutions avoided. For sceptics, it raises governance concerns: a defence-funded programme appeared to drift from future aerospace threat assessment into poorly bounded paranormal and UFO work.

The War Zone’s analysis of the 38 studies made a similar distinction. It noted that some reports came from credible academic or industry sources and dealt with legitimate long-range research areas, but also argued that EarthTech and figures close to Bigelow were prominent in the more dubious or fringe end of the list. It reported that Puthoff and Eric Davis were primary authors on six of the 38 reports between them, with Davis also co-authoring another. [The War Zone]twz.comSource details in endnotes.

Puthoff’s role was real, but it was not the same as proof

Puthoff’s documented AAWSAP/AATIP relevance sits in three overlapping roles: technical author, frontier-science network figure and later UAP-discourse amplifier. His EarthTech affiliation and authorship of vacuum-engineering material show he contributed to the speculative aerospace side of the programme. His links to Eric Davis and Bigelow-linked research networks place him close to the people and institutions that shaped the programme’s character. His later association with To The Stars Academy kept him visible in the post-2017 public disclosure push, alongside figures such as Luis Elizondo and Christopher Mellon. [The War Zone]twz.comSource details in endnotes.

The important distinction is between involvement and validation. A government-funded report does not automatically mean the government accepted the report’s strongest assumptions. Many government agencies fund speculative horizon-scanning work precisely because they want to know whether fringe-seeming ideas might contain future strategic risk. That can be prudent without implying that warp drives, wormholes or non-human craft have been demonstrated.

Puthoff’s “Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum” argument is a good example. Its abstract frames vacuum or spacetime-metric engineering as a possible long-range spaceflight concept grounded in modern physical theory and not ruled out in principle. That is a theoretical claim about possibility, not a public demonstration of an engineered craft. [arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv ADVANCED SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON VACUUMarXiv ADVANCED SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON VACUUM

This makes Puthoff’s AAWSAP/AATIP credibility conditional. He is more credible as someone who participated in a documented government-funded speculative research environment. He is not made more credible, by that fact alone, as a witness to recovered alien technology or as an evidential authority for claims that the United States possesses non-human craft.

What AARO says was not established

AARO’s most damaging finding for expansive AAWSAP/AATIP claims is not that nothing happened. It is that the things often inferred from the programme were not established. In its 2024 historical report, AARO says the aggregate findings of US government investigations did not find even one UAP case representing off-world technology; it also says it found no evidence for the US government reverse-engineering narrative provided by interviewees, while noting that some claims remained under evaluation. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

On AAWSAP/AATIP specifically, AARO says the contract produced exploratory papers addressing the 12 scientific areas in the statement of work, but that these papers were never thoroughly peer reviewed. It says it had not uncovered other substantive UAP case work by AAWSAP/AATIP beyond reviewing Blue Book and private cases, interviewing observers and conducting unrelated paranormal work at the Utah property. It also says the programme was terminated in 2012 after completion of deliverables because of DIA and DoD concerns. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

AARO’s separate KONA BLUE release is especially relevant because it shows how AAWSAP/AATIP-era assumptions later reappeared in proposed classified structures. AARO says multiple interviewees described KONA BLUE as a DHS compartment to protect retrieval and exploitation of “non-human biologics”, but AARO found it was only a proposed Special Access Program, never approved or formally established, with no materials or funding. AARO traced its origin to AAWSAP/AATIP, and said DIA terminated that earlier effort because of a cited lack of merit and utility in Bigelow’s products for DIA’s mission. [AARO]aaro.milHistory and Origin of KONA BLUEHistory and Origin of KONA BLUE

For Puthoff, this undercuts a common leap in reasoning. The existence of proposals to protect alleged materials is not the same as evidence that such materials existed. AARO’s finding is that some advocates assumed relevant materials would appear if a protected programme were created. That is a very different proposition from a confirmed chain of custody for non-human technology.

The governance problem: a real programme with blurred boundaries

The AAWSAP/AATIP controversy is not only about aliens. It is also about governance. AARO says UFO/UAP work was not specifically outlined in the contract’s statement of work, yet the contractor conducted UFO research with support from the DIA programme manager. It also says DIA did not seek or specifically authorise the paranormal work at the Utah property, even though a DIA employee set up and managed the contract. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That creates two plausible readings. A sympathetic reading is that AAWSAP was a rare attempt to look at anomalous reports without stigma, using a broad threat-assessment mandate to explore neglected possibilities. A critical reading is that the programme’s broad aerospace language allowed a small network of committed UAP and paranormal investigators to spend public money on work that was not tightly matched to the stated mission.

The 2009 Special Access Program request deepens this governance issue. AARO says Senator Reid asked Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn III to make AAWSAP/AATIP a DoD Special Access Program, but the request was declined after a recommendation by then Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence James Clapper that such a designation was not justified. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That refusal matters. Special Access Program status would have increased secrecy and institutional protection. The denial suggests senior defence leadership did not accept that AAWSAP/AATIP had demonstrated a need for such protection. In credibility terms, this means Puthoff’s network had enough influence to help generate serious proposals, but not enough evidence, at least in the official view, to justify the most sensitive programme architecture.

Why supporters still see AAWSAP/AATIP as important

Supporters of Puthoff and the broader UAP disclosure movement do not usually argue that AAWSAP’s public documents alone prove everything. Their stronger argument is more modest: the programme shows that high-level officials, intelligence personnel and contractors took UAP seriously enough to spend money, collect reports, brief people, and commission advanced technical studies. That is true as far as it goes.

The New Yorker’s 2021 account of the Pentagon’s turn towards UAP described the Bigelow-Reid-DIA network as one of the roots of the modern official UAP revival, and identified Puthoff among the figures later involved in the AATIP-connected disclosure ecosystem. [The New Yorker]newyorker.comThe New Yorker How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s SeriouslyThe New Yorker How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously The 2017 New York Times story, republished by To The Stars, also placed Puthoff alongside Elizondo and Mellon in the new private organisation that helped bring the issue into mainstream media. [To The Stars*]tothestars.mediaTo The Stars*The New York Times: Glowing Auras and 'Black MoneyTo The Stars*The New York Times: Glowing Auras and 'Black Money

That history should not be dismissed. Before 2017, public discussion of UFOs was often treated as career poison inside defence and aerospace circles. AAWSAP/AATIP, whatever its flaws, helped create a paper trail and a network that made later official UAP mechanisms more politically imaginable. It also contributed to the cultural shift that allowed military pilots, congressional offices and journalists to discuss UAP without treating the subject as inherently absurd.

For Puthoff’s credibility, this is the strongest pro-Puthoff point: he was early, persistent and institutionally connected in a field that later became less marginal. His supporters can fairly say he was not merely following a trend after it became fashionable.

Why sceptics see the same record differently

Sceptics focus on the same facts but draw the opposite lesson. They argue that AAWSAP/AATIP is less a breakthrough than a warning about circular reporting, weak evidential standards and the migration of fringe claims into official language. AARO’s historical report explicitly warns that modern claims about hidden recovered spacecraft largely arise from a consistent group of individuals involved in UAP-related efforts since at least 2009, and that many were involved in or supportive of the cancelled DIA programme and the later failed KONA BLUE attempt. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

The strongest sceptical point is that institutional access can launder uncertainty. Once speculative research is funded by government, later advocates can cite the funding as evidence that the speculation was validated. The AAWSAP/AATIP record shows that this is not necessarily true. A speculative paper, an internal proposal, a sensitive-programme request and a contractor deliverable are all real documents. None of them automatically establishes the extraordinary object of belief behind them.

This is especially important in Puthoff’s case because his career has long sat at the boundary between recognised technical expertise and highly contested frontier subjects. AAWSAP/AATIP confirms that this boundary-crossing had official buyers. It does not resolve whether the boundary-crossing produced reliable knowledge.

What AAWSAP/AATIP should and should not do for Puthoff’s credibility

AAWSAP/AATIP should raise Puthoff above the category of casual commentator. He had documented ties to a real, funded research environment, contributed to its speculative technical output, and remained connected to influential figures in the modern UAP disclosure movement. That background makes him relevant to any serious account of how UAP moved from fringe culture into congressional hearings, Pentagon offices and mainstream media.

But AAWSAP/AATIP should not be used as a shortcut around evidence. The strongest public official reviews say the programme did not establish off-world technology, did not produce thoroughly peer-reviewed proof, did not become a justified Special Access Program, and did not transfer recovered non-human material into a successor DHS compartment. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

The fairest assessment is therefore mixed. Puthoff’s AAWSAP/AATIP involvement strengthens his credibility as an insider-adjacent technical participant in a real government-funded UAP-era network. It weakens overconfident claims that his proximity to that network proves non-human craft, crash retrievals or exotic propulsion breakthroughs. The programme is evidence of institutional interest and unusual research choices, not public proof that the most extraordinary UAP claims are true.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Did AAWSAP Actually Prove?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

UFO

By Garrett M. Graff

Balances government records, disclosure claims, and skepticism.

See on Amazon

Book

In Plain Sight

By Ross Coulthart

Covers many personalities and claims tied to AAWSAP/AATIP.

See on Amazon

Book

Phenomena

By Annie Jacobsen

Provides broader historical context for intelligence-funded frontier research.

See on Amazon

Book

Skinwalkers at the Pentagon

By James T Lacatski D.Eng., James T. Lacatski et al.

Directly addresses the program, its participants, and claims.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: UFO In Plain Sight Phenomena

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Shop location

Using USA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

I Want To Believe Ufo Television Series - Canvas - Framed or Poster Available

Search eBay.co.uk: ufo poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191

Search eBay.co.uk: ufo poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

Search eBay.co.uk: ufo poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print

Search eBay.co.uk: ufo poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: media.defense.gov
   Title: U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1
   Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

2. Source: aaro.mil
   Title: History and Origin of KONA BLUE
   Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UAP_RECORDS_RESEARCH/History_and_Origin_of_KONA_BLUE_FINAL_508.pdf

3. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
   Title: The Black Vault
   Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/FOIA%2000159-2018.pdf

4. Source: earthtech.org
   Title: Earth Tech About
   Link: https://earthtech.org/about/

5. Source: earthtech.org
   Title: Earth Tech Principal Team
   Link: https://earthtech.org/team/

6. Source: arxiv.org
   Title: arXiv ADVANCED SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON VACUUM
   Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2184

7. Source: arxiv.org
   Title: arXiv Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering
   Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2184

8. Source: dia.mil
   Title: File Id
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170015/

9. Source: dia.mil
   Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170018/

10. Source: dia.mil
    Title: File Id
    Link: https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170048/

11. Source: dia.mil
    Title: FY 2023 FOIA Log
    Link: https://www.dia.mil/Portals/110/FY%202023%20FOIA%20Log.pdf

12. Source: earthtech.org
    Title: Hal Puthoff
    Link: https://earthtech.org/pubs/puthoff/

13. Source: disclosure.org
    Title: hal puthoff carlos eire
    Link: https://disclosure.org/releases/hal-puthoff-carlos-eire

14. Source: fas.org
    Title: Federation of American Scientists More Light on Black Program to Track UFOs
    Link: https://fas.org/publication/aatip-list/

15. Source: info.publicintelligence.net
    Title: DIA Advanced Space Propulsion
    Link: https://info.publicintelligence.net/DIA-AdvancedSpacePropulsion.pdf

16. Source: twz.com
    Link: https://www.twz.com/26056/heres-the-list-of-studies-the-militarys-secretive-ufo-program-funded-some-were-junk

17. Source: newyorker.com
    Title: The New Yorker How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously
    Link: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously

18. Source: tothestars.media
    Title: To The Stars*The New York Times: Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’
    Link: https://tothestars.media/blogs/press-and-news/the-new-york-times-glowing-auras-and-black-money-the-pentagon-s-mysterious-u-f-o-program?srsltid=AfmBOopOJKgM_H2kgjpIvOEOR96nfMQGwY1RjpJmSQcff9a-JY36nEJO

19. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: the black vaults aawsap aatip and post 2017 ufo timeline project
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-black-vaults-aawsap-aatip-and-post-2017-ufo-timeline-project/

20. Source: documents.theblackvault.com
    Title: dia aatip reports
    Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/dia-aatip-reports.pdf

21. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: the advanced aviation threat identification program aatip dird report research
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/the-advanced-aviation-threat-identification-program-aatip-dird-report-research/

22. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/19-F-1420.pdf

23. Source: theblackvault.com
    Title: harry reid and his aatip letter the mystery deepens
    Link: https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/harry-reid-and-his-aatip-letter-the-mystery-deepens/

24. Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
    Title: DIRD 15 DIRD Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum Spacetime Metric Engineer
    Link: https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_15-DIRD_Advanced_Space_Propulsion_Based_on_Vacuum_Spacetime_Metric_Engineer.pdf

25. Source: x.com
    Link: https://x.com/nytimes/status/942080653427953665

26. Source: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
    Link: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012arXiv1204.2184P/abstract

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Title: The UFO Lie: Shocking truth of Pentagon AAWSAP program | The Basement Office
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XD4gQS_-qY
   Source snippet

   Spooky Hustlers: How wacky UFO activists and "crazy" ghost hunters duped Congress into hunting UFOs...

2. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Why The US Military Secretly CLASSIFIED The Thermodynamics Of Time Travel
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpuqF6iz78Y
   Source snippet

   Former AATIP director on forthcoming report on unidentified aerial phenomena...

3. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6Wud0LzFQY
   Source snippet

   Joe Rogan Experience #2314 - Hal Puthoff...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf_tKn9TaP8
   Source snippet

   Why The US Military Secretly CLASSIFIED The Thermodynamics Of Time Travel...

5. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/Discovery/posts/aatip-stands-for-advanced-aerospace-threat-identification-program-and-its-very-r/10157346249393586/

6. Source: researchgate.net
   Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223130116_Advanced_Space_Propulsion_Based_on_Vacuum_Spacetime_Metric_Engineering

7. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/wtol11/posts/a-new-york-times-reports-claims-the-pentagon-spent-tens-of-millions-of-dollars-r/10154968477141481/

8. Source: scribd.com
   Link: https://www.scribd.com/document/691652297/HarryReid-Letter

9. Source: reddit.com
   Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/16ba24b/aawsap_document_obtained_via_foia_discussing_the/

10. Source: bis-space.com
    Link: https://bis-space.com/shop/product/advanced-space-propulsion-based-on-vacuum-spacetime-metric-engineering/