Within Remote Viewing
When Insider Networks Look Like Evidence
Green's links to Puthoff, Vallée and anomalous-research circles can explain influence without proving UAP claims.
On this page
- How remote viewing circles overlap with UAP circles
- Why shared contacts are not corroboration
- A safer way to weigh Green's network credibility
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
One of the most difficult credibility problems in the Kit Green story is separating genuine insider access from what can look like corroboration but may actually be repeated information circulating within the same small network. Green’s links to figures such as Harold Puthoff, Jacques Vallée, Eric Davis and other researchers are real and historically documented. Those connections help explain why he appears repeatedly in UFO/UAP discussions, classified-adjacent rumours and remote-viewing history. They do not automatically strengthen the truth of the claims being discussed. [Journal of Scientific Exploration]journalofscientificexploration.orgJournal of Scientific ExplorationThe Star Gate Archives: Reports of the United States…March 23, 2026 — Christopher Green (“Kit Green”)…
For readers trying to assess Green’s reliability, the key issue is not whether these individuals are intelligent, influential or well connected. The issue is whether multiple people are providing genuinely independent evidence, or whether the same ideas, stories and assumptions are being reinforced inside an overlapping community. In UFO and remote-viewing debates, network overlap can sometimes create the appearance of confirmation without delivering independent proof.
When Insider Networks Look Like Multiple Sources
A common mistake in UAP discussions is treating several connected people repeating similar claims as if they were separate lines of evidence.
Green’s public story intersects with a long-running group of researchers and intelligence-linked personalities associated with remote viewing, parapsychology, government anomaly studies and later UAP investigations. Public accounts place Green in contact with Puthoff during the early years of government-sponsored psychic research, while Vallée was also connected to parts of that same Stanford Research Institute and intelligence-adjacent environment. [Journal of Scientific Exploration]journalofscientificexploration.orgJournal of Scientific ExplorationThe Star Gate Archives: Reports of the United States…March 23, 2026 — Christopher Green (“Kit Green”)…
From a credibility perspective, this creates two competing interpretations:
- Supporters argue that multiple experienced insiders independently reached similar conclusions about anomalous phenomena.
- Critics argue that many of those conclusions emerged from the same social and professional network, making apparent agreement less impressive than it first appears.
This distinction matters because independent corroboration is one of the strongest forms of evidence. If two witnesses reach the same conclusion after exposure to the same conversations, documents, rumours or intermediaries, the evidential value is lower than if they arrived there separately.
In practical terms, five people within one tightly connected research circle may not provide more confirmation than one person if all five ultimately trace their information back to the same source.
How Remote-Viewing Circles Overlap With UAP Circles
The overlap between remote-viewing research and later UFO/UAP networks was not accidental.
During the Cold War, intelligence agencies funded investigations into claims that appeared unconventional but potentially relevant to national security. Remote viewing emerged from that environment. CIA-linked funding reached Stanford Research Institute work involving Puthoff and Russell Targ, while Green appears in historical accounts as an early CIA contact connected to those discussions. [Journal of Scientific Exploration]journalofscientificexploration.orgJournal of Scientific ExplorationThe Star Gate Archives: Reports of the United States…March 23, 2026 — Christopher Green (“Kit Green”)… [CIA]cia.govCIAAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMThe CIA asked AIR to address a number of key objectives during the technical review of Star…
Over time, many figures associated with that ecosystem appeared again in UFO-related contexts:
- Harold Puthoff became involved in both remote-viewing research and later UAP investigations.
- Jacques Vallée moved between UFO research, private investigations and contacts within government-linked anomaly circles.
- Eric Davis later appeared in discussions surrounding advanced aerospace claims and the so-called Wilson-Davis notes.
- Green remained a recurring figure in conversations involving medical anomalies, intelligence contacts and UFO-related testimony. [The Black Vault]documents3.theblackvault.comRecords pertaining to Unidentified Aerial PhenomenonPentagon's UAP Task Force5 Aug 2021 — The astrophysicist Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon's original UFO program and now works…
This recurring cast of personalities can create an impression that many separate sectors—science, intelligence, medicine, defence and UFO research—are independently validating the same story.
The reality is often more complicated. In many cases, the same people appear repeatedly because they know one another, exchange information and participate in the same conferences, investigations and informal discussions.
That does not mean they are wrong. It means their agreement cannot automatically be treated as independent verification.
Why Shared Contacts Are Not Corroboration
The strongest version of corroboration comes from sources that are genuinely independent.
For example, if a military sensor record, a pilot testimony and a contemporaneous government document all point to the same event without relying on one another, the evidential value increases.
By contrast, network-based corroboration can produce a misleading effect:
- Person A hears a claim.
- Person A tells Person B.
- Person B discusses it with Person C.
- Years later, all three appear publicly connected to the same story.
An audience may then see three apparent witnesses where there was really only one original source.
This problem is particularly relevant in UFO research because many claims involve:
- Classified or allegedly classified information.
- Anonymous insiders.
- Informal briefings.
- Verbal accounts rather than documents.
- Restricted access communities.
Under those conditions, tracing information back to its origin becomes extremely difficult.
The issue appears repeatedly in debates surrounding the Wilson-Davis documents, alleged crash-retrieval stories and other high-profile UAP narratives. Even when researchers identify multiple supporters of a claim, sceptics often ask whether those supporters possess independent evidence or simply belong to the same information network. [Metabunk]metabunk.orgthe congressional uap hearings debrief.13077MetabunkThe Congressional UAP Hearings Debrief1 Aug 2023 — Wilson also states he talks to USDAT Jacques Gansler about the matter, who tel…
The Remote-Viewing Example Shows The Risk Clearly
Remote viewing itself provides a useful case study.
Government involvement is real and well documented. CIA records confirm that intelligence agencies sponsored research into remote viewing and related claims over many years. [CIA]cia.govTHE NATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON…Blue Book UFO investigation, prepared analyses of UFO data for AF, liaison officer between Da…
However, official interest and scientific validation proved to be very different questions.
Supporters of the programme point to statistical findings, later meta-analyses and favourable evaluations by some researchers. Critics point to methodological problems, subjective interpretation, lack of operational usefulness and failures of replication. The final CIA-commissioned review concluded that the programme had not demonstrated practical intelligence value. [ResearchGate]researchgate.net369604750 Remote Viewing a 1974 2022 systematic review and meta analysisResearchGate(PDF) Remote Viewing: a 1974-2022 systematic review…March 20, 2023 — This is the first meta-analysis of all studies relate… [CIA]cia.govCIAAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMThe CIA asked AIR to address a number of key objectives during the technical review of Star…
What matters here is the social structure around the debate.
Many of the most prominent advocates, researchers and commentators were connected through the same institutions, projects and professional relationships. As a result, apparent agreement inside that community could be interpreted in two very different ways:
- As evidence that knowledgeable insiders repeatedly encountered genuine anomalous effects.
- As evidence that a small specialist community reinforced shared assumptions over decades.
The same interpretive problem later appears in some UFO/UAP discussions involving overlapping personalities.
Why Critics Focus On Network Effects
Sceptical researchers often pay close attention to social networks rather than only individual claims.
Their argument is not necessarily that Green, Puthoff, Vallée or others acted dishonestly. Instead, they argue that tightly connected groups can develop reinforcing belief structures.
Several factors increase the risk:
- High levels of secrecy.
- Reliance on trusted intermediaries.
- Limited access to primary evidence.
- Long-standing personal relationships.
- Strong expectations that important information exists somewhere beyond public reach.
Under those conditions, stories can gain credibility through repetition rather than verification.
This concern appears frequently in public debates surrounding intelligence-linked UFO researchers. Critics note that recurring names often appear across different narratives, while supporters view the same pattern as evidence that a persistent insider group has been tracking a genuine mystery for decades. [Reddit]reddit.comPSA/Reminder: Oke Shannon corroborated the Wilson…… corroborated the Wilson-Davis Notes in September 2022: r/UFOs. Close search. Cl…
The existence of the network is not disputed. The disagreement concerns what the network signifies.
A Safer Way To Weigh Green’s Network Credibility
For readers assessing Kit Green specifically, the safest approach is to separate network evidence from direct evidence.
Green’s associations are relevant because they demonstrate:
- Access to unusual research programmes.
- Contact with influential investigators.
- Participation in real intelligence and scientific circles.
- Exposure to classified or sensitive discussions. [Journal of Scientific Exploration]journalofscientificexploration.orgJournal of Scientific ExplorationThe Star Gate Archives: Reports of the United States…March 23, 2026 — Christopher Green (“Kit Green”)…
Those facts support the claim that Green occupied a position where he could encounter unusual information.
What they do not establish is that the information itself was accurate.
A more reliable credibility test is to ask three questions:
Was the claim first-hand or second-hand?
A direct observation generally carries more weight than a story relayed through several intermediaries.
Can the claim be independently checked?
Documents, records, physical evidence and contemporaneous reporting matter more than network reputation.
Does the corroboration come from outside the network?
Agreement among people who share contacts is less persuasive than confirmation from unrelated witnesses, institutions or evidence streams.
Applied to Green, this framework produces a more balanced assessment. His connections to remote-viewing and UAP figures are meaningful because they help explain how he obtained information and why he became influential. They do not, by themselves, validate the extraordinary claims that sometimes circulated within those same circles.
For credibility analysis, the network is therefore best treated as evidence of access and influence rather than evidence that the underlying UFO or anomalous claims are true.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Insider Networks Look Like Evidence. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Men Who Stare At Goats
Rating: 3.5/5 from 11 Google Books ratings
Explores military paranormal programmes and skepticism around them.
The Believing Brain
Useful for understanding perceived corroboration and confirmation bias.
The Invisible College
Directly relevant to overlapping researcher and insider communities.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Jacques Vallée
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Vall%C3%A9e -
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdfSource snippet
CIAAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMThe CIA asked AIR to address a number of key objectives during the technical review of Star...
-
Source: metabunk.org
Title: the congressional uap hearings debrief.13077
Link: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-congressional-uap-hearings-debrief.13077/Source snippet
MetabunkThe Congressional UAP Hearings Debrief1 Aug 2023 — Wilson also states he talks to USDAT Jacques Gansler about the matter, who tel...
-
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15y2jya/psareminder_oke_shannon_corroborated_the/Source snippet
PSA/Reminder: Oke Shannon corroborated the Wilson...... corroborated the Wilson-Davis Notes in September 2022: r/UFOs. Close search. Cl...
Published: September 2022
-
Source: researchgate.net
Title: 369604750 Remote Viewing a 1974 2022 systematic review and meta analysis
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369604750_Remote_Viewing_a_1974-2022_systematic_review_and_meta-analysisSource snippet
ResearchGate(PDF) Remote Viewing: a 1974-2022 systematic review...March 20, 2023 — This is the first meta-analysis of all studies relate...
Published: March 20, 2023
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Stargate Project (U.S. Army unit)
Link: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project_%28U.S.Army_unit%29](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project%28U.S._Army_unit%29)Source snippet
Stargate Project (U.S. Army unit)The Stargate Project's work primarily involved remote viewing, the purported ability to psychically "...
-
Source: reddit.com
Title: The latest Why Files episode takes aim at disinformation
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/18zx2xl/the_latest_why_files_episode_takes_aim_at/Source snippet
RedditThe latest Why Files episode takes aim at disinformation...January 6, 2024 — r/aliens - (Serious) Ufology and the Curious Case of...
Published: January 6, 2024
-
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/p44bkl/uap_consciousness/Source snippet
UAP & Consciousness: r/UFOsConsciousness doesn't cause wave function collapse in double slit experiment. It's the act of measurement tha...
-
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/nhw95k/alien_autopsy_email_communication_from_2001/Source snippet
Alien Autopsy Email Communication from 2001...Alien Autopsy Email Communication from 2001 between Dr.... Vallee: "there are undisclosed...
-
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cq55cp/hal_puthoff/Source snippet
Hal Puthoff: r/UFOsWhile educated, credentialed, and intelligent, Puthoff is at best credulous or worse manipulative. Everyone intereste...
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO conspiracy theories
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_conspiracy_theoriesSource snippet
UFO conspiracy theories... aliens.: 97 New theories linked a supposed UFO cover-up to alien abductions and cattle mutilations.: 87–9...
-
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100010001-0Source snippet
THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON...Blue Book UFO investigation, prepared analyses of UFO data for AF, liaison officer between Da...
-
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374170335_Hyperconvergence_Religion_Politics_and_UFOsSource snippet
(PDF) Hyperconvergence: Religion, Politics, and UFOs14 Sept 2023 — give a lecture for an organization calling itself 'Alien Resistance' (...
-
Source: journalofscientificexploration.org
Link: https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/3865/2573Source snippet
Journal of Scientific ExplorationThe [Star Gate]({{ 'star-gate/' | relative_url }}) Archives: Reports of the United States...March 23, 2026 — Christopher Green (“Kit Green”)...
Published: March 23, 2026
-
Source: documents3.theblackvault.com
Title: Records pertaining to Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
Link: https://documents3.theblackvault.com/documents/cbp/Records%20pertaining%20to%20Unidentified%20Aerial%20Phenomenon.pdfSource snippet
Pentagon's UAP Task Force5 Aug 2021 — The astrophysicist Eric Davis, who consulted with the Pentagon's original UFO program and now works...
Additional References
-
Source: medium.com
Link: https://medium.com/the-peculiar-truth/the-peculiar-truth-about-the-cias-project-stargate-61ac0534d2f4Source snippet
The Peculiar Truth about the CIA's Project StargateTarg and Puthoff were so impressed with his abilities that they published papers about...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/tonyd2wild/posts/2025-became-one-of-the-most-active-years-ever-recorded-for-ufo-and-uap-related-a/1380512116865568/Source snippet
2025 became one of the most active years ever recorded...The researchers hunted down rumours about alien spacecraft and found, for insta...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/WSJ/posts/a-tiny-pentagon-office-had-spent-months-investigating-conspiracy-theories-about-/1088844496435480/Source snippet
Bonus Fact: The CIA coined the term ""UFO"" in 1953 to replace ""flying saucer"" and sound...Read more...
-
Source: docs.house.gov
Title: HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113
Link: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-ShellenbergerM-20241113.pdfSource snippet
United States Department Of Defense And The...13 Nov 2024 —... kit-greens-usaf-ufo-mentor.html. (PUBLIC DOMAIN) - 25 February... UFOs/...
-
Source: arxiv.org
Title: Since the Air Force was more
Link: https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06794v2Source snippet
The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea...In this article, Keyhoe claimed that UFOs were alien spacecraft and that the US gov...
-
Source: newyorker.com
Title: how the pentagon started taking ufos seriously
Link: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriouslySource snippet
The New YorkerHow the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously30 Apr 2021 — The Pentagon Started Taking UFOs Seriously. For decades, fly...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/SteveBartlettShow/posts/a-few-days-ago-161-classified-uap-files-were-released-to-the-public-that-include/1531892531652951/Source snippet
Why Aren't Astronomers Paying More Attention To UFOs? Syed Ilyas...
-
Source: audible.co.uk
Link: https://www.audible.co.uk/author/Jacques-Vallee/B001K8JD8QSource snippet
He has investigated reports of UFOs all over the...Read more...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/shawnryan762/posts/do-you-believe-in-remote-viewing-or-any-other-forms-of-parapsychology-shawnryans/1511586156155460/Source snippet
d after a sci-fi show or is it just me.Read more...
-
Source: news.ycombinator.com
Link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42585418Source snippet
was a CIA project that explored parasciencesStargate was a CIA project that explored parasciences: telepathy, twin telepathy, astral proj...
Topic Tree