Branchoria UFO Collection UFO Collection

Start with the overview, then follow the sections that match your goal

Within Kirkpatrick

How Much Authority Did AARO Give Him?

Kirkpatrick's AARO role matters because his authority came from government access, technical expertise and institutional limits.

On this page

  • What AARO was created to do
  • Kirkpatrick's defence and intelligence background
  • Where official access strengthens and limits credibility
Preview for How Much Authority Did AARO Give Him?

Introduction

Sean Kirkpatrick’s authority in the UAP debate came less from personal witness testimony than from institutional position. As the first director of the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, he was placed at the centre of the US government’s attempt to collect, analyse and explain unidentified anomalous phenomena across defence settings. That gave him unusual credibility: he had official access, a technical intelligence background and a mandate to examine both new military reports and older claims of hidden crash-retrieval or reverse-engineering programmes. It also created the main limit on his credibility: much of the underlying evidence, classified checking and interagency process cannot be fully inspected by the public.

Overview image for AARO Role The fairest reading is that AARO made Kirkpatrick a more authoritative source on official process, sensor limitations and the absence of verified extraterrestrial evidence than most public UAP commentators. It did not make him an independent public proof source for every contested case. His credibility is strongest where his claims align with documented AARO procedures, public reports and broader data-quality warnings from agencies such as NASA. It is weakest where critics ask the public to trust a classified review that remains only partly visible. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

What AARO was created to do

AARO was not created simply as a “UFO office” in the popular sense. The Department of Defense announced it in July 2022 after the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, expanded an earlier airborne-object body into an all-domain office. Its stated mission was to synchronise efforts across the Department of Defense and other US agencies to “detect, identify and attribute” objects of interest near military installations, operating areas, training ranges, special-use airspace and other areas of concern. The remit explicitly included space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That wording matters for Kirkpatrick’s credibility. AARO’s official job was not to validate a disclosure movement, disprove aliens as a cultural question, or adjudicate every private UFO story. Its job sat closer to defence governance: turn scattered reports into a standardised process, identify possible hazards, improve collection, and decide whether an object was ordinary, adversarial, experimental, unresolved, or genuinely anomalous. The office was also organised around lines of effort such as surveillance, system capabilities, intelligence analysis, mitigation, governance, and science and technology, placing it inside a national-security framework rather than a civilian open-science project. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

This helps explain why Kirkpatrick often sounded cautious rather than dramatic. AARO’s mission rewarded attribution, not mystery. A case that remains unidentified because of poor data is not automatically evidence of exotic technology; it is an unresolved intelligence or safety problem. The FY2023 UAP annual report reflected that logic, saying many cases remained technically unresolved because of insufficient data, while only a small percentage showed “interesting signatures” such as high-speed travel or unknown morphologies. [aaro.mil]aaro.milUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical ReportUnclassified Final DSD AARO Historical Report

AARO Role illustration 1

Why Kirkpatrick’s background strengthened his official standing

Kirkpatrick’s official biography gave him a stronger technical and intelligence profile than many public figures in the UFO/UAP debate. The Department of Defense described him as having more than two decades of experience in scientific and technical intelligence, space policy, research and development, acquisitions and operations, with specialisation in space and counterspace mission areas. It also listed a PhD in physics, early work on lasers and materials, and later roles involving the National Reconnaissance Office, CIA, DIA, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, US Strategic Command and US Space Command. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

For readers assessing credibility, that background has a specific meaning. It does not prove his conclusions about UAP are correct. It does mean he was well placed to understand several things that frequently confuse public debate: sensor artefacts, classified aerospace programmes, intelligence collection gaps, foreign technology concerns, and the difference between a startling report and a verified attribution. His expertise is therefore most relevant when he discusses process and evidential standards, not when treated as a personal oracle on every sighting.

The Department’s own public framing also endorsed him as a governance choice. In a December 2022 media roundtable, Under Secretary Ronald Moultrie called Kirkpatrick a career intelligence officer and scientist who embodied “scientific rigor and objectivity”, while Kirkpatrick said AARO was building an interagency effort to document, collect, analyse and, where possible, resolve UAP reports. That is an institutional vote of confidence, but it is still internal confidence from the same defence system being scrutinised. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

Where AARO access made his claims more credible

AARO gave Kirkpatrick three forms of credibility that most UAP personalities do not have: access to classified and unclassified government records, the ability to coordinate across defence and intelligence channels, and authority to develop standardised reporting and analysis methods. In the 2024 Historical Record Report, AARO said it reviewed official US government investigatory efforts since 1945, searched classified and unclassified archives, conducted about 30 interviews, and partnered with officials responsible for controlled and special access programme oversight. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

That kind of access matters especially for claims about hidden programmes. Public UAP debate often turns on allegations that a secret part of the US government, or a contractor network, recovered off-world craft and concealed reverse-engineering work from Congress. AARO’s first historical report directly addressed that narrative and said it found no evidence that any official US investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review panel had confirmed a UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology. It also concluded that most investigated sightings were ordinary objects or phenomena, often misidentified. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

AARO’s work also gave Kirkpatrick a more nuanced position than a simple debunker’s slogan. The office did not say every case was solved. It said many unresolved cases lacked enough data to reach a conclusion, and that better sensor collection, modelling, simulation and peer review were needed for the small number of cases with more interesting characteristics. This distinction is central to Kirkpatrick’s official credibility: his strongest claim is not “nothing unusual can exist”, but “the available official record has not verified extraterrestrial technology, and unresolved does not equal alien”. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

What a Pentagon Scientist Found Out About UFOs with Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick

Channel: Event Horizon · Views: 110.1K · Uploaded: October 2024 · Length: 1 hour 20 minutes

Open on YouTube

Where official access also limited public trust

The same factors that gave Kirkpatrick authority also created suspicion. AARO operated inside the Department of Defense and relied on classified records, intelligence channels and special-access programme checks. That means the public can see summaries, hearing statements, videos, case pages and annual reports, but not the full evidential substrate behind many conclusions. For critics, this creates a trust gap: AARO asks the public to accept that it checked the right places, asked the right officials, and was not blocked by the very secrecy it was meant to examine.

This problem is not unique to Kirkpatrick. It is built into UAP governance. The strongest official review of secret programmes is likely to require classified access; the strongest public proof requires disclosure that national-security agencies may resist. AARO sits uncomfortably between those needs. Kirkpatrick could credibly say his office reviewed classified and unclassified archives and coordinated with programme-oversight officials, but ordinary readers cannot independently audit every classified query, interview, denial or compartment check behind that statement. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

NASA’s 2023 independent UAP study reinforces the point from a different angle. It found that UAP analysis was hampered by poor sensor calibration, lack of multiple measurements, missing sensor metadata and lack of baseline data. That supports Kirkpatrick’s caution about overinterpreting weak cases, but it also means official certainty should be modest when the underlying data are thin. In short, poor data weaken extraordinary claims, but they can also prevent complete public closure. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govSource details in endnotes.

The Senate hearing showed both authority and constraint

Kirkpatrick’s April 2023 Senate appearance is a useful concrete test of his credibility. He testified as AARO director before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, giving lawmakers an official account of AARO’s mission, activities, oversight and budget. The hearing placed him under congressional questioning rather than media-only commentary, which strengthened the institutional weight of his statements. [armed-services.senate.gov]armed-services.senate.govOpen source on senate.gov.

At the same time, the hearing highlighted the limits of what could be said publicly. Kirkpatrick discussed case numbers, analytic priorities and examples of imagery, but not every classified detail behind them. One Defense Department account of the hearing described a South Asia MQ-9 video in which an apparent wake or cavitation was assessed as likely a sensor artefact linked to video compression, with final review pending. Another publicly released clip, the “Middle East Object”, was described as unidentified but not displaying anomalous behaviour, and as representative of cases where limited surrounding data prevent resolution. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”)

That is exactly where Kirkpatrick’s official credibility is most useful and most frustrating. AARO could show how a striking-looking video might be explained by mundane imaging effects, which is valuable. But unresolved public clips also left room for critics to say the office was offering partial explanations while retaining deeper material out of view. The hearing therefore improved transparency compared with past decades, but it did not eliminate the transparency problem.

AARO Role illustration 2

The historical report became the credibility battleground

AARO’s 2024 Historical Record Report was the major product most closely associated with Kirkpatrick’s leadership, even though it was released after his departure. It reviewed past US government UAP investigations and directly addressed claims about recovered off-world craft, biological remains and reverse-engineering programmes. Its public conclusion was blunt: AARO found no empirical evidence for those claims and no confirmed sighting of extraterrestrial technology. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

Supporters of Kirkpatrick’s approach saw the report as the most serious official attempt in years to separate claims from evidence. It did not merely say “no aliens”; it described a review of archives, interviews and programme-oversight channels, and it framed many persistent narratives as the product of misidentification, misunderstood classified programmes, popular culture and repeated second-hand claims. Reuters and other outlets reported the same central finding: most sightings were ordinary objects or phenomena, while better-quality data would probably resolve many remaining cases. [reuters]reuters.comSource details in endnotes. Critics saw the same report differently. For them, AARO’s conclusions were limited by institutional self-review: the Pentagon was investigating allegations about hidden Pentagon or contractor activity, while giving the public a largely summarised account of its classified checks. Some also objected to the tone of Kirkpatrick’s later public comments, arguing that his criticism of “circular reporting” and UFO true believers risked discouraging witnesses who already feared stigma or retaliation. That criticism does not by itself prove AARO missed a hidden programme, but it does matter for credibility because a UAP office needs trust from potential witnesses as well as sceptical discipline.

The Grusch dispute exposed AARO’s hardest governance problem

The most public collision between AARO’s official posture and whistleblower-driven UAP claims involved David Grusch, the former intelligence official who alleged that the US had a long-running crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering programme involving non-human craft. Grusch’s claims were central to the 2023 congressional surge around UAP transparency, but they were largely based on what he said he had been told by others rather than public physical evidence. [Time]time.comSource details in endnotes.

Kirkpatrick and AARO’s position was that no verifiable information had substantiated claims of extraterrestrial-material possession or reverse-engineering programmes. After Grusch’s House testimony, Kirkpatrick publicly objected that claims had not been brought to AARO in a way his office could investigate. This became a credibility dispute about process as much as substance: Grusch’s supporters argued that witnesses might avoid AARO if they mistrusted the office; Kirkpatrick’s supporters argued that extraordinary allegations cannot be validated if the official investigative body is not given testable details. [Wikipedia]WikipediaDavid Grusch UFO whistleblower claimsDavid Grusch UFO whistleblower claims

For a reader, the key distinction is this: Grusch’s allegations increased political pressure for investigation, but they did not publicly produce the sort of physical evidence, documents or named programme access that would overturn AARO’s official conclusion. AARO’s rebuttal carried institutional weight, but because much of the review remained classified, it could not fully satisfy readers who already believed the relevant evidence would be hidden in compartments beyond normal scrutiny.

Pentagon UFO Hunter Says Alien "Religion" Has Infiltrated US Government

Channel: New York Post · Views: 29.0K · Uploaded: June 2024 · Length: 22 minutes

Open on YouTube

Did Kirkpatrick’s scepticism damage or improve his credibility?

Kirkpatrick’s post-AARO comments made him a sharper public figure. In Scientific American, he argued that the government’s review had found no evidence of aliens and that many claims arose through circular reporting, with people repeating stories ultimately traceable to the same small network. The Guardian later reported his view that conspiracy-minded actors inside and around government were helping drive repeated spending and investigation without producing evidence. [Scientific American]scientificamerican.comwe need to investigate ufos but without the distraction of conspiracywe need to investigate ufos but without the distraction of conspiracy

That scepticism improves his credibility with readers who prioritise evidential discipline. UAP history contains many examples of stories gaining authority through repetition, official-sounding language or classified mystique. A director willing to say “show the evidence” is a necessary counterweight to rumour laundering. His stance also aligns with NASA’s data-quality findings and AARO’s emphasis on standardised collection rather than witness charisma alone. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

But his scepticism also created a communication cost. AARO needed cooperation from pilots, service members, contractors and former officials who might already fear ridicule. A public tone that appears dismissive can make the office look less like a neutral intake channel and more like a gatekeeper. The credibility issue is therefore not simply whether Kirkpatrick was too sceptical; it is whether his scepticism was paired with enough visible openness to persuade distrustful witnesses that AARO would fairly evaluate what they brought forward.

Hearing to receive testimony on the activities of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office

Channel: Congressional Dish · Views: 122 · Uploaded: December 2024 · Length: 53 minutes

Open on YouTube

The best credibility assessment

AARO gave Sean Kirkpatrick real, verifiable authority. He was not an internet commentator, anonymous insider or celebrity witness. He was the named director of a Pentagon office with a statutory and interagency role, a strong technical intelligence background, and access to official records unavailable to the public. Those facts make his conclusions about AARO’s findings important, especially his repeated position that the office found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology or hidden reverse-engineering programmes. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick BiographyU.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography(#endnote-1 “Endnote 1”) [2U.S. Department of War]defense.govdod announces the establishment of the all domain anomaly resolution officedod announces the establishment of the all domain anomaly resolution office

That authority should not be overstated. AARO’s conclusions are official findings, not fully public evidence packets. They are strongest as statements about what the office says it found through its authorised process. They are weaker as final public closure for readers who require independent access to classified records, contractor files, witness transcripts and special-access programme checks. The unresolved cases in AARO’s own reporting also show that “not enough data” remains a recurring outcome, not a minor footnote. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOfficial UAP ImageryOfficial UAP Imagery

The practical judgement is balanced but not neutral in the sense of “anything goes”. Kirkpatrick’s AARO leadership substantially strengthens his credibility as an official, technically literate sceptic of extraordinary UAP claims. It does not make every AARO conclusion immune from critique, and it does not remove the need for better public data, clearer reporting channels and careful treatment of witnesses. His credibility rests on a disciplined but limited proposition: within the official review AARO described, the evidence did not support claims of recovered extraterrestrial craft, while many unresolved UAP cases remain unresolved because the data are too poor to justify stronger claims either way.

AARO Role illustration 3

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Much Authority Did AARO Give Him?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Browse more on Amazon: UFOs Area 51 The Pentagon's Brain

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA
Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

  1. Source: defense.gov
    Title: dod announces the establishment of the all domain anomaly resolution office
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3100053/dod-announces-the-establishment-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office/

  2. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: Unclassified Final DSD AARO Historical Report
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf

  3. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

  4. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/portals/136/PDFs/AARO%20Mission%20Brief_DOPSR%20Reviewed%2007-2023.pdf

  5. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf

  6. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: U.S. Department of War Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick Biography
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Jul/20/2003039076/-1/-1/1/DR-SEAN-M-KIRKPATRICK-BIOGRAPHY.PDF

  7. Source: defense.gov
    Title: usdis ronald moultrie and dr sean kirkpatrick media roundtable on the all domai
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3249303/usdis-ronald-moultrie-and-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-media-roundtable-on-the-all-domai/

  8. Source: reuters.com
    Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/

  9. Source: defense.gov
    Title: dod working to better understand resolve anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/

  10. Source: armed-services.senate.gov
    Link: https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/to-receive-testimony-on-the-mission-activities-oversight-and-budget-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office

  11. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/FOIA/2023%20FOIAs/23-F-0922_4.pdf

  12. Source: defense.gov
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/880273/

  13. Source: time.com
    Link: https://time.com/6298287/congress-ufo-hearing/

  14. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: David Grusch UFO whistleblower claims
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims

  15. Source: war.gov
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3583248/statement-by-deputy-secretary-of-defense-kathleen-hicks-on-the-upcoming-departu/

  16. Source: defense.gov
    Title: dod office moving ahead in mission to identify anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3249317/dod-office-moving-ahead-in-mission-to-identify-anomalous-phenomena/

  17. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

  18. Source: war.gov
    Title: aaro director dr sean kirkpatrick holds an off camera media roundtable
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3575588/aaro-director-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-holds-an-off-camera-media-roundtable/

  19. Source: war.gov
    Title: usdis ronald moultrie and dr sean kirkpatrick media roundtable on the all domai
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3249303/usdis-ronald-moultrie-and-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-media-roundtable-on-the-all-domai/

  20. Source: war.gov
    Link: https://www.war.gov/UFO/

  21. Source: war.gov
    Title: department of defense releases the annual report on unidentified anomalous phen
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3964824/department-of-defense-releases-the-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phen/

  22. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/

  23. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

  24. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/

  25. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: Official UAP Imagery
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

  26. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Sean M. Kirkpatrick
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_M._Kirkpatrick

  27. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: All domain Anomaly Resolution Office
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-domain_Anomaly_Resolution_Office

  28. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

  29. Source: armed-services.senate.gov
    Title: kirkpatrick statement
    Link: https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/download/kirkpatrick-statement

  30. Source: armed-services.senate.gov
    Link: https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/download/transcript-4-19-2023

  31. Source: space.com
    Title: pentagon ufo office aaro historical report no emprical evidence alien technology
    Link: https://www.space.com/pentagon-ufo-office-aaro-historical-report-no-emprical-evidence-alien-technology

  32. Source: scientificamerican.com
    Title: we need to investigate ufos but without the distraction of conspiracy
    Link: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-investigate-ufos-but-without-the-distraction-of-conspiracy/

  33. Source: scientificamerican.com
    Title: Scientific American Here’s What I Learned as the U.S. Government’s UFO Hunter
    Link: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-what-i-learned-as-the-u-s-governments-ufo-hunter/

  34. Source: dvidshub.net
    Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/880273/middle-east-object

  35. Source: dvidshub.net
    Link: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/973055/pr-003-unresolved-uap-report-africa-2023

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi0H_mkwTW0
    Source snippet

    Pentagon UFO Hunter Says Alien "Religion" Has Infiltrated US Government...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2owSRaG4j-c
    Source snippet

    Pentagon Reveals 757 UAP Sightings With Near Miss Safety Concerns...

  3. Source: youtube.com
    Title: What a Pentagon Scientist Found Out About UFOs with Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyK46wdMJkQ
    Source snippet

    Hearing to receive testimony on the activities of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office...

  4. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Pentagon UFO Hunter Says Alien “Religion” Has Infiltrated US Government
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0qi5GOROUQ
    Source snippet

    What a Pentagon Scientist Found Out About UFOs with Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick...

  5. Source: dni.gov
    Title: 3733 2023 consolidated annual report on unidentified anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/3733-2023-consolidated-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena

  6. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/aldotcom/posts/a-former-redstone-arsenal-scientist-helped-expose-how-the-defense-department-has/1097682635739966/

  7. Source: instagram.com
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKu2hwtB2dV/

  8. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/wired/posts/new-a-report-released-today-by-nasas-independent-study-team-describes-how-the-ag/695732782422317/

  9. Source: aliensarerunningoperations.com
    Link: https://www.aliensarerunningoperations.com/

  10. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f20ywp/aaro_has_stated_on_record_they_will_not_find/

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Kirkpatrick

Related pages 7

More on this topic 3